Table of ~~Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on June 2, 2021.~~ Our proxy materials, including the proxy statement and Annual Report to Stockholders, are being made available on or about April 22, 2021 on our website at https://denalitherapeutics.com/investors in the SEC Filings section of our Investor & Media Relations web page, as well at the following website: www.proxyvote.com. We are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.Contents


									By order of the board of directors,

									Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.
									President, Chief Executive Officerand Director
									South San Francisco, California

									April ~~22, 2021~~18, 2023

~~Your vote is important. To vote your shares, please follow the instructions in theNotice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which is being mailed to youon or about April 22, 2021.~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

-i-

Table of Contents

DENALI THERAPEUTICS INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR ~~2021~~2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time on June ~~2, 2021~~1, 2023

This proxy statement and form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors (the “Board”) for use at our ~~2021~~2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), and any postponements, adjournments or continuations thereof. ~~Due to health and safety concerns relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual only meeting format.~~ Stockholders will not be able to physically attend the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on June ~~2, 2021~~1, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. You will be able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting by accessing www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/~~DNLI2021~~DNLI2023 and entering the 16-digit control number found on your Notice of Internet Availability, your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials. The virtual format of the Annual Meeting allows us to preserve stockholder access while also saving time and money for both us and our stockholders. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our annual report is first being mailed on or about April ~~22, 2021~~18, 2023 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the virtual Annual Meeting. If you receive a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail unless you specifically request these materials.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below addresses certain frequently asked questions but is not intended to be a summary of all matters contained in this proxy statement. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting your shares.

Why am I receiving these materials?

The Board is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at Denali’s Annual Meeting, which will take place on June ~~2, 2021.~~1, 2023. Stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement.

All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials via the Internet, including this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 (the “Annual Report”), as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February ~~26, 2021.~~27, 2023. The Notice includes information on how to access the proxy materials, how to submit your vote over the Internet, by phone, or how to request a paper copy of the proxy materials. This proxy statement and the Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

There are three proposals scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

•the election of ~~four~~three class IIII directors to hold office until the ~~2024~~2026 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

•the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021;~~2023; and

•the approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation, as described in this proxy statement.

As of the date of this proxy statement, our management and board of directors were not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this proxy statement and in the notice accompanying this proxy statement.

-1-

Table of Contents

How does our board of directors recommend that I vote?

Our board of directors recommends that you vote:

•FOR the election of each of the ~~four~~three directors nominated by the Board and named in this proxy statement as class IIII directors to serve for a three-year term;

•FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021;~~2023; and

•FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation, as described in this proxy statement.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Holders of our common stock at the close of business on April ~~12, 2021,~~4, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held as of the Record Date. As of the Record Date, there were ~~121,177,045~~136,736,309 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Stockholders are not permitted to cumulate votes with respect to the election of directors. The shares you are entitled to vote include shares that are (1) held of record directly in your name, and (2) held for you as the beneficial owner through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with ~~American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC,~~Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., our transfer agent, then you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote electronically at the virtual Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank or Other Nominee. If, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee on your behalf, then you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker, bank or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to routine matters but may not vote your shares with respect to any non-routine matters. For additional information, see “What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?” below.

~~Could developments regarding COVID-19 impact the date, time or location of the meeting?~~

We are actively monitoring the public health and travel safety concerns relating to COVID-19 and the advisories or mandates that federal, state, and local governments, and related agencies, may issue. Our Annual Meeting is a completely virtual meeting of stockholders to be conducted via live webcast, in order to accommodate social distancing of those attending the meeting, and as such we do not anticipate an impact to the date, time or location of the meeting. If we determine that it is not possible or advisable to hold our Annual Meeting as currently planned, we will announce by press release as well as through a filing with the SEC.

How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, you can vote in one of the following ways:

~~-2-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

•You may vote via the Internet. To vote via the Internet, go to ~~http://www.voteproxy.com~~www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions on the proxy card or in the notice of annual meeting and Internet availability of proxy materials. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on ~~June 1, 2021~~May 31, 2023 to be counted. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to return a proxy card by mail.

•You may vote by telephone. To vote by telephone, dial toll-free 1-800-690-6903 and follow the instructions on the proxy card or in the notice of annual meeting and Internet availability of proxy materials. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on ~~June 1, 2021~~May 31, 2023 to be counted. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return a proxy card by mail.

-2-

Table of Contents

•You may vote by mail. To vote by mail using the proxy card (if you requested paper copies of the proxy materials to be mailed to you), you need to complete, date and sign the proxy card and return it promptly by mail so that it is received no later than ~~June 1, 2021.~~May 31, 2023. The persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares you own in accordance with your instructions on the proxy card you mail. If you return the proxy card, but do not give any instructions on a particular matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will vote the shares you own in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. The Board recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the ~~four~~three directors nominated by the Board and named in this proxy statement as class IIII directors to serve for a three-year term, FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021,~~2023, and FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation, as described in this proxy statement.

•You may vote via meeting website. If you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you may vote your shares live at the virtual Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend and participate in our virtual annual meeting via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/~~DNLI2021,~~DNLI2023, we encourage you to vote over the Internet or by telephone as described above, or by returning a proxy card following your request of paper copies. This will ensure that your vote will be counted if you are unable to, or later decide not to, participate in the virtual Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank, or Other Nominee. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held of record by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank, or other nominee. You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee in order to instruct your broker, bank, or other nominee how to vote your shares. The availability of Internet and telephone voting options will depend on the voting process of your broker, bank or other nominee.

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your proxy instructions at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

•entering a new vote by Internet or telephone;

•signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date;

•delivering a written revocation to our Secretary at Denali Therapeutics Inc., 161 Oyster Point Blvd., South San Francisco, California 94080, by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on ~~June 1, 2021;~~May 31, 2023; or

•attending and electronically voting at the virtual Annual Meeting.

~~-3-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank, or Other Nominee. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, you must contact the broker, bank, or other nominee holding your shares and follow their instructions to change your vote or revoke your proxy.

-3-

Table of Contents

What is the effect of giving a proxy?

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors. The persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxy holders by our board of directors. When a proxy is properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors. If any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date, unless you have properly revoked your proxy, as described above.

What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy but you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted:

•FOR the election of each of the ~~four~~three directors nominated by the Board and named in this proxy statement as class IIII directors to serve for a three-year term (Proposal No. 1);

•FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021~~2023 (Proposal No. 2);

•FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation, as described in this proxy statement (Proposal No. 3); and

•In the discretion of the named proxy holders regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker, Bank, or Other Nominee. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide your broker, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, then your broker, bank, or other nominee will determine if it has discretion to vote on each matter. Brokers do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters. Proposal No. 1 (election of directors) and Proposal No. 3 (approval of the advisory vote on executive compensation) are not considered routine matters, while Proposal No. 2 (ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm) is a routine matter. As a result, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee, then your broker, bank, or other nominee may not vote your shares with respect to Proposal No. 1 and Proposal No. 3, which would result in a “broker non-vote,” but may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to Proposal No. 2. For additional information regarding broker non-votes, see “What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?” below.

What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?

An abstention represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. If a stockholder indicates on its proxy card that it wishes to abstain from voting its shares, or if a broker, bank or other nominee holding its customers’ shares of record causes abstentions to be recorded for shares, these shares will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As a result, abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum and will also count as votes against a proposal in cases where approval of the proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote ~~at the Annual Meeting~~thereon (e.g., Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 3). However, because the outcome of Proposal No. 1 (election of directors) will be determined by plurality votes, abstentions will have no impact on the outcome of any of such proposals as long as a quorum exists.

-4-

Table of Contents

A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank, or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker, bank, or other nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast. Therefore, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more readily attainable but will not otherwise affect the outcome of the vote on any proposal.

What is a quorum?

A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our bylaws and Delaware law. A majority of the shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. As noted above, as of the Record Date, there were a total of ~~121,177,045~~136,736,309 shares of common stock outstanding, which means that ~~60,588,523~~68,368,155 shares of common stock must be represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to have a quorum. If there is no quorum, a majority of the shares present at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to a later date.

How many votes are needed for approval of each proposal?

•Proposal No. 1: The election of class IIII directors requires a plurality vote of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. This means that the ~~four~~three nominees who receive the most FOR votes will be elected. You may (i) vote FOR all nominees, (ii) WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, or (iii) vote FOR all nominees except for those specific nominees from whom you WITHHOLD your vote. Any shares not voted FOR a particular nominee (whether as a result of voting withheld or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election. If you WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, you will be deemed to have abstained from voting on Proposal No. 1, and such abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

•Proposal No. 2: The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. You may vote FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 2, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.

•Proposal No. 3: For the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation, an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved is required to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. You may vote FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal No. 3, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.

-5-

Table of Contents

How are proxies solicited for the Annual Meeting and who is paying for such solicitation?

Our board of directors is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting by means of the proxy materials. We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing, and distribution of the proxy materials. Copies of solicitation materials will also be made available upon request to brokers, banks, and other nominees to forward to the beneficial owners of the shares held of record by such brokers, banks, or other nominees. The original solicitation of proxies may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, electronic communication, or other means by our directors, officers, employees, or agents. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services, although we may reimburse such individuals for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation. We do not plan to retain a proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxies.

If you choose to access the proxy materials and/or vote over the Internet, you are responsible for Internet access charges you may incur. If you choose to vote by telephone, you are responsible for telephone charges you may incur.

What does it mean if I received more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on each Notice to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Is my vote confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots, and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within Denali or to third parties, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

I share an address with another stockholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?

We have adopted an SEC-approved procedure called ~~“householding,~~“householding.” ~~which has been approved by the SEC.~~ Under this procedure, we will deliver only one copy of our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, and for those stockholders that received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail, one copy of our annual report to stockholders and this proxy statement, to multiple stockholders who share the same address (if they appear to be members of the same family) unless we have received contrary instructions from an affected stockholder. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards if they received a paper copy of proxy materials in the mail. This procedure reduces our printing and mailing costs. Upon written or oral request, we will promptly deliver a separate copy of the proxy materials and annual report to any stockholder at a shared address to which we delivered a single copy of any of these documents. To receive a separate copy, or, if you are receiving multiple copies, to request that we only send a single copy of next year’s proxy materials and annual report, you may contact us as follows:

Denali Therapeutics Inc.

Attention: Secretary

161 Oyster Point Blvd.,

South San Francisco, California 94080

(650) 866-8548

Stockholders who hold shares in street name may contact their brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other nominee to request information about householding.

-6-

Table of Contents

How can I find out the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us at that time, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an amendment to the Form 8-K to publish the final results.

What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?

Stockholder Proposals

Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of stockholders by submitting their proposals in writing to our Secretary in a timely manner. For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our ~~2022~~2024 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written proposal at our principal executive offices not later than December ~~23, 2021.~~20, 2023. In addition, stockholder proposals must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), regarding the inclusion of stockholder proposals in company-sponsored proxy materials. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to:

Denali Therapeutics Inc.

Attention: Secretary

161 Oyster Point Blvd.,

South San Francisco, California 94080

(650) 866-8548

Our bylaws also establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders who wish to present a proposal before an annual meeting of stockholders but do not intend for the proposal to be included in our proxy statement. Our bylaws provide that the only business that may be conducted at an annual meeting is business that is (i) specified in our proxy materials with respect to such meeting, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the annual meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors, or (iii) properly brought before the annual meeting by a stockholder of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting who has delivered timely written notice to our Secretary, which notice must contain the information specified in our bylaws. To be timely for our ~~2022~~2024 annual meeting of stockholders, our Secretary must receive the written notice at our principal executive offices:

•not earlier than February ~~6, 2022;~~3, 2024; and

•not later than March ~~8, 2022.~~4, 2024.

In the event that we hold our ~~2022~~2024 annual meeting of stockholders more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the first anniversary of the date of the Annual Meeting, then notice of a stockholder proposal that is not intended to be included in our proxy statement must be received no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day before such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the following two dates:

•the 90th day prior to such annual meeting; or

•the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.

If a stockholder who has notified us of his, her, or its intention to present a proposal at an annual meeting does not appear to present his, her, or its proposal at such annual meeting, we are not required to present the proposal for a vote at such annual meeting.

-7-

Table of Contents

Nomination of Director Candidates

You may propose director candidates for consideration by our corporate governance and nominating committee. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for membership on our board of directors and should be directed to our Secretary at the address set forth above. For additional information regarding stockholder recommendations for director candidates, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors.”

In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our bylaws. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Secretary in accordance with our bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by our Secretary within the time period described above under “Stockholder Proposals” for stockholder proposals that are not intended to be included in a proxy statement.

Availability of Bylaws

A copy of our bylaws may be obtained by accessing our public filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. You may also contact our Secretary at our principal executive office for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

-8-

Table of Contents

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our business affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors, which is currently comprised of ~~ten (10)~~eleven (11) members. Nine (9) of our ~~ten (10)~~eleven (11) directors are independent within the meaning of the ~~independent director requirements~~listing rules of ~~NASDAQ.~~the Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq). Our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

Upon the recommendation of our corporate governance and nominating committee, we are nominating ~~Douglas Cole, M.D., Jay Flatley, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.,~~Ms. Cook, and ~~Nancy A. Thornberry.~~Drs. Schenkein and Watts. If elected, ~~Dr. Cole, Mr. Flatley, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne~~Ms. Cook, and ~~Ms. Thornberry~~Drs. Schenkein and Watts will each hold office for a three-year term until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in ~~2024~~2026 or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

The following table sets forth the names, ages as of March 31, ~~2021~~2023, and certain other information, including the composition of the committees, as of the date of this proxy statement, for each of the directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting (who are also nominees for election as a director at the Annual Meeting) and for each of the continuing ~~directors:~~directors and for our new director:

Name Class Age Position Director
Since Current
Term
Expires Expiration of Term For
Which Nominated
1. Director Nominees
Douglas Cole, M.D.(1)
I 60 Director 2015 2021 2024
Jay Flatley(1)(2)
I 68 Director 2015 2021 2024
Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.(2)
I 61 Director 2015 2021 2024
Nancy A. Thornberry(3)
I 64 Director 2021 2021 2024
2. Continuing Directors
Peter Klein(1)
II 58 Director 2018 2022 —
Robert Nelsen(2)
II 57 Director 2015 2022 —
Vicki Sato, Ph.D.(3)
II 72 Chairperson of the Board 2015 2022 —
David Schenkein, M.D.(3)
III 63 Director 2015 2023 —
Jennifer Cook(3)
III 55 Director 2018 2023 —
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D. III 45 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 2015 2023 —


Name	Class	Age	Position	Director Since	Current Term Expires	Expiration of Term For Which Nominated
1. Director Nominees
Jennifer Cook(3)	III	57	Director	2018	2023	2026
David Schenkein, M.D.(3)	III	65	Director	2015	2023	2026
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	III	47	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	2015	2023	2026

2. Continuing Directors
Douglas Cole, M.D.(2)	I	62	Director	2015	2024	—
Jay Flatley(1)(2)	I	70	Director	2015	2024	—
Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.(3)	I	63	Director	2015	2024	—
Nancy A. Thornberry(2)	I	66	Director	2021	2024	—
Vicki Sato, Ph.D.(3)	II	74	Chairperson of the Board	2015	2025	—
Erik Harris(1)	II	53	Director	2022	2025	—
Peter Klein(1)	II	60	Director	2018	2025	—

3. New Director
Steve E. Krognes(4)	II	54	Director	2022	2025	—

(1)Member of our audit ~~committee~~committee.

(2)Member of our compensation ~~committee~~committee.

(3)Member of our corporate governance and nominating ~~committee~~committee.

(4)Mr. Krognes joined our board of directors as of May 1, 2022 upon transition from his role as Chief Financial Officer.

-9-

Table of Contents

Nominees for Director

~~Douglas Cole, M.D.~~Jennifer Cook has served ~~as a member of~~on our board of directors since ~~May 2015. Dr. Cole joined Flagship Pioneering, which conceives, creates, resources and develops first-in-category life sciences companies, in 2001, and~~November 2018. Ms. Cook is currently ~~a Managing Partner focused on life science investments. Dr. Cole currently~~the owner of Jennifer Cook Consulting and serves onas an advisor at Google Ventures. Ms. Cook served as the ~~board~~Chief Executive Officer of ~~directors of Cygnal Therapeutics, Foghorn Therapeutics, KSQ Therapeutics, Sana Biotechnology,~~GRAIL from January 2018 to June 2019. Previously, Ms. Cook was at Roche Pharmaceuticals and ~~Sigilon Therapeutics, and~~Genentech, where she held a number of ~~private companies. Previously, Dr. Cole~~senior management positions; from January 2017 to December 2017, Ms. Cook served as Senior Vice President, Global Head of Clinical Operations for Roche Pharmaceuticals; from September 2013 to December 2016, Ms. Cook served as Head of Region Europe Pharma for Roche Pharmaceuticals; and from July 2010 to September 2013, Ms. Cook served as the Senior Vice President, Business Unit Head Immunology and Ophthalmology for Genentech. Ms. Cook currently also serves on the boards of directors of BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Ms. Cook holds a ~~number of public companies including Quanterix Corporation, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Receptos, AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Editas Medicine, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals~~B.A. in human biology and ~~Concert Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Cole received his M.D.~~an M.S. in biology from Stanford University, as well as an M.B.A. from the Haas School of Business at University of ~~Pennsylvania School of Medicine and his B.A. in English from Dartmouth College.~~California, Berkeley.

We believe ~~Dr. Cole is qualified~~Ms. Cook’s extensive experience as a senior management executive of healthcare and biotechnology companies, including as the Senior Vice President of one of the world’s largest healthcare companies, qualifies her to serve on our board of directors because of his substantial experience as a venture capital investor in emerging life sciences companies, as well as his experience serving on the boards of directors for several life sciences companies.directors.

~~-9-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Jay Flatley~~ David Schenkein, M.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2015. ~~Since January 2020, Mr. Flatley serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of Illumina,~~Dr. Schenkein is currently a ~~public company focused on sequencing- and array-based solutions for genetic analysis (“Illumina”)~~general partner in GV (Google Ventures). ~~From July 2016 to January 2020, he~~Previously, Dr. Schenkein served as ~~Illumina’s Executive Chairman. From December 2013 to July 2016, Mr. Flatley served as the Chief Executive Officer of Illumina and as the~~ President and Chief Executive Officer of Agios Pharmaceuticals from ~~October 1999~~August 2009 to ~~December 2013. Prior~~January 2019. From March 2006 to ~~joining Illumina, Mr. Flatley was co-founder,~~July 2009, Dr. Schenkein served as a Senior Vice President ~~Chief Executive Officer, and a director~~ of ~~Molecular Dynamics, a life sciences company focused on genetic discovery and analysis, from July 1994 until its sale to Amersham Pharmacia Biotech in September 1998. Mr. Flatley also~~Oncology Development at Genentech. Dr. Schenkein currently serves ~~as Chairman of the Wellcome Trust Leap Fund,~~ on the boards of directors ~~at Coherent, Iridia, Zymergen,~~of Agios Pharmaceuticals and Prime Medicine, each of which is a public company, and on the ~~board~~boards of ~~trustees for The Salk Institute, and is an Advisory Board member for UC San Diego's Moores Cancer Center. Jay previously~~directors of a number of private companies. Previously, Dr. Schenkein served on the ~~board~~boards of directors of ~~Juno Therapeutics. Mr. Flatley~~Bluebird Bio and Foundation Medicine. He also currently serves as an adjunct attending physician in hematology at Tufts Medical Center. Dr. Schenkein received his ~~B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering~~M.D. from ~~Stanford~~the State University of New York Upstate Medical School and his B.A. in ~~economics~~chemistry from ~~Claremont McKenna College.~~Wesleyan University.

We believe ~~Mr. Flatley~~that Dr. Schenkein is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive background in the ~~life sciences~~biotechnology industry and leadership experience as a senior executive and director of ~~companies in the life sciences industry.~~biotechnology companies.

~~Marc Tessier-Lavigne,~~

Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D. is one of our co-founders and has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2015 and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since August 2015. ~~From March 2015 to August 2016,~~Previously, Dr. ~~Tessier-Lavigne served as the Chairman of our board of directors. Since September 2016, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne has served as President of Stanford University. From March 2011 to September 2016,~~Watts was at Genentech, a biotechnology company, where he ~~served as President of The Rockefeller University, as well as professor~~held various research and ~~head of the Laboratory of Brain Development and Repair. From September 2003 to March 2011, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne served in positions~~leadership roles of increasing responsibility ~~at Genentech, where~~between 2004 and 2015; including his time served as Director of the Department of Neuroscience from 2013 to February 2015. In addition, Dr. Watts led Genentech’s blood-brain barrier team between 2009 and 2015. Dr. Watts has authored and co-authored more than 60 scientific papers and has been an inventor on a number of patents in ~~2009 he was named Executive Vice President for Research~~the blood-brain barrier and Chief Scientific Officer. He currently serves on the board of directors of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Previously, he served on the boards of directors of Pfizer, Juno Therapeutics and Agios Pharmaceuticals. neurodegeneration fields.Dr. ~~Tessier-Lavigne~~Watts received his Ph.D. in ~~neurophysiology~~biological sciences from ~~University College London, his B.A. in philosophy and physiology from Oxford~~Stanford University and his ~~B.Sc.~~B.S. in ~~physics~~biology from ~~McGill University. He conducted postdoctoral work at~~ the ~~MRC Developmental Neurobiology Unit in London and at Columbia University.~~University of Utah.

We believe Dr. ~~Tessier-Lavigne~~Watts is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of ~~his pioneering research, scientific knowledge,~~the perspective and experience he provides as one of our co-founders ~~service on boards of directors of public companies in the life sciences industry~~ and ~~leadership in the biotechnology industry.~~

~~Nancy A. Thornberry~~ ~~has served on~~as our ~~board of directors since January 2021. Ms. Thornberry has served as~~President and Chief Executive Officer, ~~of Kallyope, Inc. since November 2015. Between August 2013 and October 2015, Ms. Thornberry was self-employed~~ as ~~a consultant to companies~~well as his broad experience within the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the ~~biotechnology~~area of neuroscience and ~~pharmaceutical industries. Prior to that, Ms. Thornberry spent over 30 years at Merck, a pharmaceutical company, where she held a variety of positions including Senior Vice President~~drug discovery and Franchise Head, Diabetes and Endocrinology, from April 2011 to July 2013, Senior Vice President and Franchise Head, Diabetes and Obesity, from September 2009 to April 2011, Vice President, Worldwide Basic Research Head, Diabetes and obesity, from February 2007 to September 2009 and Executive Director, Metabolic Disorders, from 2004 to February 2007, among other positions. Ms. Thornberry received a B.S. in Chemistry and Biology from Muhlenberg College.

~~We believe Ms. Thornberry is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive scientific background and experience in the life sciences industry.~~development.

-10-

Table of Contents

Continuing Directors

~~Peter Klein~~ has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2018. Mr. Klein served as Chief Financial Officer of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC (“WME”), a marketing firm, from January 2014 to June 2014. Prior to joining WME, Mr. Klein spent over 11 years at Microsoft Corporation, including serving as Chief Financial Officer from November 2009 until May 2013. Mr. Klein currently serves on the board of directors of F5 Networks Inc., a software company, Accolade, Inc., a personalized healthcare company, and two private companies, Sarcos Corporation and Joshua Green Corporation. Mr. Klein previously served on the board of directors of Apptio, Inc. and Livible, Inc. Mr. Klein holds a B.A. in history from Yale University and an M.B.A. from the University of Washington.

~~We believe Mr. Klein’s extensive experience as a senior finance executive, including as the chief financial officer of one of the world’s largest companies, qualifies him to serve on our board.~~

~~Robert Nelsen~~Douglas Cole, M.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since May 2015. ~~Mr. Nelsen co-founded ARCH Venture Partners, L.P.,~~Dr. Cole joined Flagship Pioneering, which conceives, creates, resources and develops first-in-category bioplatform companies, in 2001, and is currently a ~~venture capital firm~~Managing Partner focused on ~~early-stage technology companies, in 1986 and has served as a Managing Director of ARCH Venture Partners or its affiliated entities since 1994. Mr. Nelsen~~life science investments. Dr. Cole currently serves on the ~~board~~boards of directors of ~~Vir Biotechnology, Inc., Sana Biotechnology, Karuna~~Foghorn Therapeutics, ~~Inc., Beam~~Sigilon Therapeutics, and ~~Hua Medicine, Inc.,~~Sana Biomedicine, each of which is a public biotechnology company, and ~~currently serves~~ on the ~~board~~boards of directors of a number of private companies. In the past five years, Dr. Cole also served on the board of directors of Quanterix Corporation, a public life sciences company. Dr. Cole received his M.D. from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and his A.B. in English from Dartmouth College.

We believe Dr. Cole is qualified to serve on our board of directors given his substantial experience as an investor in emerging biopharmaceutical and life sciences companies as well as his experience serving on the boards of directors of multiple public and private biopharmaceutical companies.

Jay Flatley has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2015. Mr. ~~Nelsen~~Flatley served as the Chairman and Acting Chief Executive Officer of Zymergen Inc. until it was acquired by Gingko Bioworks in 2022. Mr. Flatley previously spent over 20 years serving in various leadership roles at Illumina, Inc., a public company focused on sequencing- and array-based solutions for genetic analysis. His roles included Chairman of the board of directors from January 2020 to May 2021, Executive Chairman from July 2016 to January 2020, Chief Executive Officer from December 2013 to July 2016, and Chief Executive Officer and President from October 1999 to December 2013. Prior to joining Illumina, Mr. Flatley was co-founder, President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Molecular Dynamics, a life sciences company focused on genetic discovery and analysis, from July 1994 until its sale to Amersham Pharmacia Biotech in September 1998. Mr. Flatley also serves as Chairman of the Wellcome Trust Leap Fund, and is on the board of directors at Cellanome, Iridia, and Rivian Automotive, on the board of trustees for The Salk Institute, and is an Advisory Board member for UC San Diego's Moores Cancer Center. Mr. Flatley previously served on the board of directors of a number of public biotechnology companies, including Unity Biotechnology, Inc. from 2015 to December 2020, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2007 to June 2017, Fate Therapeutics, Inc. from 2007 to June 2014, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2012 to June 2018, Sage Therapeutics, Inc. from 2013 to March 2016, Juno Therapeutics and Coherent Inc. from 2013 to March 2018 (until it was acquired by Celgene Corporation), Bellerophon Therapeutics, Inc. from 2014 to November 2015, Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2015 to September 2018 and Gossamer Bio, Inc. from 2017 to December 2018 (prior to its initial public offering). He previously served as a trustee of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute and the Institute for Systems Biology, and was a member of the board of directors of the National Venture Capital Association. Mr. ~~Nelsen~~Flatley received his ~~M.B.A.~~B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering from ~~the~~Stanford University ~~of Chicago~~ and his ~~B.S.~~B.A. in economics from ~~the University of Puget Sound with majors in Economics and Biology.~~Claremont McKenna College.

We believe Mr. ~~Nelsen~~Flatley is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive background in the life sciences industry and leadership experience as a ~~venture capitalist building~~senior executive of companies in the life sciences industry.

Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D. is one of our co-founders and ~~serving~~has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2015. From March 2015 to August 2016, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne served as the Chairman of our board of directors. Since September 2016, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne has served as President of Stanford University. From March 2011 to September 2016, he served as President of The Rockefeller University, as well as professor and head of the Laboratory of Brain Development and Repair. From September 2003 to March 2011, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne served in positions of increasing responsibility at Genentech, where in 2009 he was named Executive Vice President for Research and Chief Scientific Officer. He currently serves on the board of directors of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Previously, he served on the boards of directors of ~~many~~Pfizer, Juno Therapeutics and Agios Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Tessier-Lavigne received his Ph.D. in neurophysiology from University College London, his B.A. in philosophy and physiology from Oxford University and his B.Sc. in physics from McGill University. He conducted postdoctoral work at the MRC Developmental Neurobiology Unit in London and at Columbia University.

We believe Dr. Tessier-Lavigne is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his pioneering research, scientific knowledge, experience as one of our co-founders, service on boards of directors of public companies in the life sciences industry and ~~private emerging~~leadership in the biotechnology industry.

-11-

Table of Contents

Nancy A. Thornberry has served on our board of directors since January 2021. Ms. Thornberry served as Chief Executive Officer of Kallyope, Inc. from November 2015 until October 2021, and currently serves on its board of directors and as Chair, R&D. Ms. Thornberry also serves on the boards of Schrödinger, a public company, and NY Genome Center, a non-profit institution; she previously served on the board of Intarcia Therapeutics. Between August 2013 and October 2015, Ms. Thornberry was self-employed as a consultant to companies in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Prior to that, Ms. Thornberry spent over 30 years at Merck, a pharmaceutical company, where she held a variety of positions including ~~biotechnology companies.~~Senior Vice President and Franchise Head, Diabetes and Endocrinology, from April 2011 to July 2013, Senior Vice President and Franchise Head, Diabetes and Obesity, from September 2009 to April 2011, Vice President, Worldwide Basic Research Head, Diabetes and obesity, from February 2007 to September 2009 and Executive Director, Metabolic Disorders, from 2004 to February 2007, among other positions. Ms. Thornberry received a B.S. in Chemistry and Biology from Muhlenberg College.

We believe Ms. Thornberry is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive scientific background and experience in the life sciences industry.

Vicki Sato, Ph.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2015 and as Chairperson of our board of directors since August 2016. Currently she is a Venture Partner at ARCH Venture Capital. From September 2006 until July 2017, Dr. Sato served as a ~~professor~~Professor of ~~management practice~~Management Practice at Harvard Business School. From July 2005 until October 2015, she also had an appointment as Professor of the Practice in the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology at Harvard University. From September 2000 to May 2005, Dr. Sato served as the President of Vertex Pharmaceuticals, a pharmaceutical company, with general management responsibility for business and corporate development, commercial operations, legal and finance, in addition to research and development. From 1992 until 2000, she served as the Chief Scientific Officer and Senior Vice President of Research and Development of Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Sato joined Vertex Pharmaceuticals in 1992, after serving as Vice President of Research at Biogen, a biotechnology company, where she also served as a member of the Scientific Board. Dr. Sato serves on the boards of directors of ~~Bristol Myers Squibb Company, BorgWarner, Inc.,~~Allogene Therapeutics, Vir Biotechnology, Inc., and Akouos, Inc. (until their acquisition in December 2022), each of which is a public company, and on the boards of directors of multiple private companies. She previously served on the board of directors of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company until May 2021, BorgWarner Corporation until April 2021, PerkinElmer ~~Inc.~~ until April 2017 and the board of directors of Syros Pharmaceuticals until December 2019. Dr. Sato received her A.M. and Ph.D. degrees from Harvard University and her A.B. in biology from Radcliffe College.

We believe Dr. Sato is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive industry experience and leadership experience as a senior executive and director of several life sciences companies.

~~-11-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~David Schenkein, M.D.~~ Erik Harrishas served as a member of our board of directors since ~~April 2015. Dr. Schenkein is~~February 2022. Erik Harris currently serves as the Chief Commercial Officer and Executive Vice President of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc., a ~~general partner in GV (Google Ventures). He is also Executive Chairman~~biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of ~~the board~~a diverse portfolio of ~~directors of Agios Pharmaceuticals, a pharmaceuticals company. Previously, Dr. Schenkein~~therapies for patients with rare and ultra-rare genetic diseases. Prior to his appointment as Chief Commercial Officer, Mr. Harris served as the Senior Vice President and ~~Chief Executive Officer~~Head of ~~Agios~~North American Commercial Operations at Ultragenyx from July 2017 to June 2019. Mr. Harris’s prior business experience includes six years at Crescendo Bioscience, a molecular diagnostic company, most recently as Vice President of Commercial. Earlier in his career, Mr. Harris served as Vice President of Marketing at Intermune, Inc. and also held positions in the commercial organizations at Elan Pharmaceuticals, ~~from August 2009 to February 2019. From April 2006 to July 2009, Dr. Schenkein~~Inc., Genentech, Inc., and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. At the start of his professional career, Mr. Harris served as a ~~Senior Vice President of Oncology Development at Genentech. Dr. Schenkein currently serves on~~Lieutenant Commander in Naval Aviation and Congressional Fellow for the boards of directors of Agios Pharmaceuticals. Previously, Dr. Schenkein served on the board of directors of Foundation Medicine and Bluebird bio. He also currently serves as an adjunct attending physician in hematology at Tufts Medical Center. Dr. SchenkeinUnited States Navy. Mr. Harris received his ~~M.D. from~~Masters of Business Administration at the ~~State University~~Wharton School of ~~New York Upstate Medical School~~Business, and ~~his B.A. in chemistry from Wesleyan University.~~Bachelor of Science at the United States Naval Academy.

We believe ~~that Dr. Schenkein~~Mr. Harris is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of his extensive ~~background in the biotechnology~~ industry experience and leadership experience as a chief commercial officer and senior ~~executive and director~~vice president of ~~biotechnology~~several life sciences companies.

~~Jennifer Cook~~ ~~has served on our board~~

-12-

Table of directors since November 2018. Ms. Cook is currently the owner of Jennifer Cook Consulting. Ms. Cook served as the Chief Executive Officer of GRAIL from January 2018 to June 2019. Previously, Ms. Cook was at Roche Pharmaceuticals and Genentech, where she held a number of senior management positions; from January 2017 to December 2017, Ms. Cook served as Senior Vice President, Global Head of Clinical Operations for Roche Pharmaceuticals; from September 2013 to December 2016, Ms. Cook served as Head of Region Europe Pharma for Roche Pharmaceuticals; and from July 2010 to September 2013, Ms. Cook served as the Senior Vice President, Business Unit Head Immunology and Ophthalmology for Genentech. Ms. Cook currently also serves on the boards of directors of BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., Jazz Pharmaceuticals and a number of private companies. Ms. Cook holds a B.A. in human biology and an M.S. in biology from Stanford University, as well as an M.B.A. from the Haas School of Business at University of California, Berkeley.Contents

We believe Ms. Cook’s extensive experience as a senior management executive of healthcare and biotechnology companies, including as the Senior Vice President of one of the world’s largest healthcare companies, qualifies her to serve on our board of directors.

~~Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.~~ ~~is one of our co-founders and~~ Peter Klein has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2018. Mr. Klein served as Chief Financial Officer of William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC (“WME”), a marketing firm, from January 2014 to June 2014. Prior to joining WME, Mr. Klein spent over 11 years at Microsoft Corporation, including serving as Chief Financial Officer from November 2009 until May 2013. Mr. Klein currently serves on the boards of directors of F5 Inc., a software company, Accolade, Inc., a personalized healthcare company, and Sarcos Technology and Robotics Corporation. Mr. Klein previously served on the board of directors of Apptio, Inc. Mr. Klein holds a B.A. in history from Yale University and an M.B.A. from the University of Washington.

We believe Mr. Klein’s extensive experience as a senior finance executive, including as the chief financial officer of one of the world’s largest companies, qualifies him to serve on our board.

New Director

Steve E. Krognes served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Denali Therapeutics from October 2015 until April 30, 2022; on May 1, 2022 he was appointed to the board of directors. Mr. Krognes joined Denali from Genentech, where he served as Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Executive Committee from April 2009 to September 2015. Mr. Krognes also oversaw Genentech’s Site Services organization between 2011 and 2015, and ~~as our President~~Genentech’s IT organization between 2009 and ~~Chief Executive Officer since August~~2011. He chaired the Genentech Access to Care Foundation between 2009 and 2015. From ~~March 2015~~January 2004 to ~~August 2015, Dr. Watts acted~~April 2009, Mr. Krognes served as ~~our interim President, Chief Scientific Officer and~~ Head of ~~Research~~Mergers & Acquisitions and ~~Development. Previously, Dr. Watts was~~a member of the Finance Executive Committee at ~~Genentech,~~Roche, a Swiss biotechnology ~~company, where he held various research and leadership roles of increasing responsibility between 2004 and 2015; including his time~~company. From July 2002 to December 2003, Mr. Krognes served as Director of M&A at Danske Bank based in Norway. Mr. Krognes currently serves as a director at Guardant Health, Gritstone bio, Inc. and Argenx SE, and previously served on the ~~Department~~board at Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Krognes served as a board member of ~~Neuroscience from 2013 to February 2015. In addition, Dr. Watts led Genentech’s blood-brain barrier team~~the California Life Science Association between ~~2009~~2010 and 2015 and ~~he served as Chair~~California Academy of ~~the Joint Research Committee with AC Immune between 2006 and 2010 (program currently in Phase 3) and between 2012 and~~Sciences from 2014 ~~(program currently in Phase 1). Dr. Watts~~to 2018. He received his ~~Ph.D. in biological sciences~~M.B.A. from ~~Stanford University~~Harvard Business School and his B.S. in ~~biology~~Economics from The Wharton School of the University of ~~Utah. Dr. Watts has authored and co-authored more than 60 scientific papers and has been an invited peer reviewer in numerous publications including~~ ~~Cell~~, ~~Nature Biotechnology~~, ~~Nature Medicine~~, ~~Neuron~~, ~~Science~~ ~~and~~ ~~Science Translational Medicine~~.Pennsylvania.

We believe ~~Dr. Watts is qualified~~Mr. Krognes' extensive experience as a senior finance executive, including as the chief financial officer of both Genentech and Denali, qualifies him to serve on our board of directors because of the perspective and experience he provides as one of our co-founders and as our President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as his broad experience within the pharmaceutical industry, particularly in the area of neuroscience and drug discovery and development.

~~-12-~~

board.

~~Table of Contents~~

Director Independence

Our common stock is listed on The ~~NASDAQ~~Nasdaq Global Select ~~Market.~~Market ("Nasdaq"). Under the Nasdaq rules, ~~of NASDAQ,~~ independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors within a specified period after the completion of ~~our~~its initial public offering. In addition, the Nasdaq rules ~~of NASDAQ~~ require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees be independent. Audit committee members and compensation committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 and Rule 10C-1, respectively, under the Exchange Act. Under the Nasdaq rules, ~~of NASDAQ,~~ a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3 and under the Nasdaq rules, ~~of NASDAQ,~~ a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of our audit committee, our board of directors, or any other board committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

-13-

Table of Contents

To be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10C-1 and under the Nasdaq rules, ~~of NASDAQ,~~ the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the member of the compensation committee is independent, including a consideration of all factors specifically relevant to determining whether the director has a relationship to the company which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, including, but not limited to: (i) the source of compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee paid by the company to such director; and (ii) whether such director is affiliated with the company, a subsidiary of the company or an affiliate of a subsidiary of the company.

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees, and the independence of our directors and considered whether any director has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his background, employment, and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors has determined that none of ~~Dr. Cole, Ms.~~Mses. Cook and Thornberry, Messrs. Flatley, Harris and Klein, and ~~Nelsen, Dr.~~Drs. Cole, Sato, ~~Dr.~~ Schenkein, ~~Dr.~~and Tessier-Lavigne, ~~and Ms. Thornberry,~~ representing nine of our ~~ten~~eleven directors, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, and that each of these directors and the director nominee is “independent” as that term is defined under the ~~rules of NASDAQ.~~Nasdaq rules. Dr. Watts, isour Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Krognes, our former Chief Financial Officer, are not considered independent under ~~NASDAQ’s~~Nasdaq’s independence standards. Our board of directors also determined that Messrs. Klein (chairperson) ~~and~~, Flatley, and ~~Dr. Cole,~~Harris, who comprise our audit committee, and ~~Messrs.~~Mr. Flatley (chairperson), Dr. Cole, and ~~Nelsen and Dr. Tessier-Lavigne,~~Ms. Thornberry, who comprise our compensation committee, satisfy the independence standards for committee members established by applicable SEC rules and the Nasdaq listing ~~standards of NASDAQ.~~ standards.

In making these determinations, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our ~~company~~Company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them described in the section titled “Related Party Transactions.”

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

~~-13-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Board Composition

Board Leadership Structure

Our board of directors is currently chaired by Dr. Sato. As a general policy, our board of directors believes that separation of the positions of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer reinforces the independence of the board of directors from management, creates an environment that encourages objective oversight of management’s performance, and enhances the effectiveness of the board of directors as a whole. As such, Dr. Watts serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer while Dr. Sato serves as our Chairperson of the board of directors but is not an officer. We expect and intend the positions of Chairperson of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer to continue to be held by two individuals in the future.

Board Diversity

Although we do not have a specific policy with respect to Board diversity, as part of our Board recruitment efforts, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks out candidates who can contribute to the diversity of views and perspectives of the Board, which includes seeking out individuals of diverse ethnicities, a balance in terms of gender, and individuals with diverse perspectives informed by other personal and professional experiences.

-14-

Table of Contents

The following table presents summary information about the composition of our Board, as self-disclosed by our directors. Each of the categories in the table has the meaning set forth in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).


Board Diversity Matrix (As of March 31, 2023)
Board Size:
Total Number of Directors	11
	Female	Male	Non-Binary	Did not Disclose Gender
Gender Identity
Directors	3	8	—	—
Demographic Background
African American or Black	—	1	—	—
Asian (other than South Asian)	1	—	—	—
White	2	7	—	—
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background	—

Board Meetings and Committees

During ~~2020,~~2022, our board of directors held ~~six~~four meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of our board of directors held during the period for which he or she served as a director and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our board of directors on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.

It is the policy of our board of directors to regularly have separate meeting times for independent directors without management. Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of our board of directors at annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend. Six directors attended our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

We have established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a corporate governance and nominating committee. We believe that the composition of these committees ~~will meet~~meets the criteria for independence under, and the functioning of these committees comply with the requirements of, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Nasdaq rules, ~~of the NASDAQ Global Select Market,~~ and SEC rules and regulations. ~~We intend to comply with~~The following table sets forth information regarding the ~~requirements~~current membership of our board of directors and committees of the ~~NASDAQ Global Select Market with respect to~~board of directors.

-15-

Table of Contents

Director

Independence

Board

Audit Committee

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance & Nominating

2022 Meeting Attendance(1)

Vicki Sato, Ph.D.

86%

Douglas Cole, M.D.

100%

Jennifer Cook

100%

Jay Flatley

92%

Erik Harris

88%

Peter Klein

100%

Steve E. Krognes(2)

100%

Robert Nelsen(2)

100%

David Schenkein, M.D.

88%

Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.

100%

Nancy A. Thornberry

88%

Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.

100%

2022 Meetings

(1)Includes meetings of the board of directors and meetings of each committee ~~composition~~ of ~~independent directors.~~ the board while the director served on the board and such committee, respectively.

(2)Mr. Nelsen served on the board of directors until June 2, 2022. Mr. Krognes joined our board of directors as of May 1, 2022 upon transition from his role as Chief Financial Officer.

Each committee has the ~~composition and~~ responsibilities described below.

Audit Committee

The members of our audit committee are ~~Messrs. Klein and Flatley and Dr. Cole, each of whom is a non-employee member of our board of directors. Mr. Klein serves as~~detailed in the ~~chairperson of our audit committee.~~table above. All members of our audit committee meet the requirements for independence and financial literacy of audit committee members under ~~current NASDAQ~~Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Our audit committee chairperson, Mr. Klein, is our audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined under the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and possesses financial sophistication, as defined under ~~NASDAQ~~Nasdaq listing standards.

The responsibilities of our audit committee include, among other things:

•selecting and hiring the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;

•helping to ensure the independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm;

-16-

Table of Contents

•pre-approving all audit and non-audit services and fees;

•reviewing financial statements and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited and quarterly consolidated financial statements, the results of the independent audit and the quarterly reviews, and the reports and certifications regarding internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls;

~~-14-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

•preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires to be included in our annual proxy statement;

•reviewing reports and communications from the independent registered public accounting firm;

•reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;

•reviewing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;

•reviewing cybersecurity risk and compliance;

•reviewing related party transactions; and

•establishing and overseeing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of accounting related complaints and the confidential submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

Our audit committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and ~~the~~Nasdaq listing ~~requirements of NASDAQ.~~requirements. A copy of the charter of our audit committee is available on our website at https://denalitherapeutics.com/investors in the Corporate Governance section of our Investor & Media Relations web page. ~~During 2020, our audit committee held five meetings.~~

Compensation Committee

The members of our compensation committee are ~~Dr. Tessier-Lavigne and Messrs. Flatley and Nelsen. Dr. Tessier-Lavigne serves as~~detailed in the ~~chairperson of our compensation committee.~~table above. All members of our compensation committee meet the requirements for independence under current ~~NASDAQ~~Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of the compensation committee is also a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The purpose of our compensation committee is to oversee our compensation policies, plans and benefit programs and to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors relating to compensation of our executive officers. The responsibilities of our compensation committee include, among other things:

•overseeing our overall compensation philosophy and compensation policies, plans and benefit programs;

•reviewing and approving or recommending to the board of directors for approval compensation for our executive officers and directors;

•preparing the compensation committee report that the SEC will require to be included in our annual proxy statement; and

•administering our equity compensation plans.

Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the Nasdaq listing ~~standards of NASDAQ.~~standards. A copy of the charter of our compensation committee is available on our website at https://denalitherapeutics.com/investors in the Corporate Governance section of our Investor & Media Relations web page. ~~During 2020, our compensation committee held four meetings.~~

-17-

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The members of our corporate governance and nominating committee are ~~Dr. Sato, Dr. Schenkein, Ms. Cook and Ms. Thornberry. Dr. Sato serves as~~detailed in the ~~chairperson of our corporate governance and nominating committee.~~table above. All members of our corporate governance and nominating committee meet the requirements for independence under ~~current NASDAQ~~the Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. The responsibilities of our corporate governance and nominating committee include, among other things:

~~-15-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

•identifying, evaluating and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding nominees for election to our board of directors and its committees;

•considering and making recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition of our board of directors and its committees;

•reviewing developments in corporate governance practices;

•evaluating the adequacy of our corporate governance practices and reporting; and

•evaluating the performance of our board of directors and of individual directors.

Our corporate governance and nominating committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the Nasdaq listing ~~standards of NASDAQ.~~standards. A copy of the charter of our corporate governance and nominating committee is available on our website at https://denalitherapeutics.com/investors in the Corporate Governance section of our Investor & Media Relations web page. ~~During 2020, our corporate governance and nominating committee held four meetings.~~

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During ~~the past~~ fiscal year 2022, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne, Mr. Flatley, Dr. Cole, and ~~Messrs. Flatley and Nelsen~~Ms. Thornberry served on our compensation committee. None of the members of our compensation committee is or has at any time been an officer or was during ~~2020~~2022 an employee of our ~~company.~~Company. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.

Considerations in Evaluating Director Nominees

It is the policy of the corporate governance and nominating committee of our board of directors to consider recommendations for candidates to our board of directors from stockholders holding no less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock continuously for at least 12 months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation or nomination.

The corporate governance and nominating committee will use the following procedures to identify and evaluate any individual recommended or offered for nomination to our board of directors:

•The corporate governance and nominating committee will consider candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended to the corporate governance and nominating committee from other sources.

•In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of our board of directors eligible for re-election, the corporate governance and nominating committee will consider the following:

•◦The current size and composition of our board of directors and the needs of our board of directors and the respective committees of our board of directors.

•

-18-

Table of Contents

◦Such factors as character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like. The corporate governance and nominating committee evaluates these factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weighting or priority to any of these factors.

•◦Other factors that the corporate governance and nominating committee deems appropriate.

~~-16-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

•The corporate governance and nominating committee requires the following minimum qualifications to be satisfied by any nominee for a position on our board of directors:

•◦The highest personal and professional ethics and integrity.

•◦Proven achievement and competence in the nominee’s field and the ability to exercise sound business judgment.

•◦Skills that are complementary to those of the existing board of directors.

•◦The ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to the Company’s success.

•◦An understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities that is required of a member of our board of directors and the commitment of time and energy necessary to diligently carry out those responsibilities.

•◦If the corporate governance and nominating committee determines that an additional or replacement director is required, the corporate governance and nominating committee may take such measures that it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of a director candidate, including candidate interviews, inquiry of the person or persons making the recommendation or nomination, engagement of an outside search firm to gather additional information, or reliance on the knowledge of the members of the corporate governance and nominating committee, our board of directors or management.

The corporate governance and nominating committee may propose to our board of directors a candidate recommended or offered for nomination by a stockholder as a nominee for election to our board of directors. In the future, the corporate governance and nominating committee may pay fees to third parties to assist in identifying or evaluating director candidates.

Stockholder Recommendations for Nominations to the Board of Directors

A stockholder that wants to recommend a candidate for election to our board of directors should direct the recommendation in writing by letter to the Company, attention of the Secretary, at Denali Therapeutics Inc., 161 Oyster Point Blvd., South San Francisco, California 94080. The recommendation must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company, and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of Company stock. Such recommendations must also include a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate, particularly within the context of the criteria for board membership, including issues of character, integrity, judgment, diversity of experience, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like and personal references.

~~-17-~~-19-

Table of Contents

A stockholder that instead desires to nominate a person directly for election to our board of directors at an annual meeting of the stockholders must meet the deadlines and other requirements set forth in Section 2.4 of the Company’s bylaws and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Section 2.4 of the Company’s bylaws requires that a stockholder who seeks to nominate a candidate for director must provide a written notice to the Secretary of the Company not later than the 45th day nor earlier than the 75th day before the one-year anniversary of the date on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials or a notice of availability of proxy materials (whichever is earlier) for the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that no annual meeting was held in the previous year or if the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more than 60 days after the one-year anniversary of the date of the previous year’s annual meeting, then, for notice by the stockholder to be timely, it must be so received by the Secretary of the Company not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting, or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which Public Announcement (as defined below) of the date of such annual meeting is first made. In no event shall any adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting or the announcement thereof commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice. “Public Announcement” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press, or a comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by the corporation with the SEC pursuant to Section 13, 14, or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or any successor thereto.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Our board of directors believes that management speaks for Denali Therapeutics Inc. Individual board members may, from time to time, communicate with various constituencies that are involved with the Company, but it is expected that board members would do this with knowledge of management and, in most instances, only at the request of management.

In cases where stockholders and other interested parties wish to communicate directly with our non-management directors, messages can be sent to our Secretary, at Denali Therapeutics Inc., 161 Oyster Point Blvd., South San Francisco, California 94080. Our Secretary monitors these communications and will provide a summary of all received messages to the board of directors at each regularly scheduled meeting of the board of directors. Our board of directors generally meets on a quarterly basis. Where the nature of a communication warrants, our Secretary may determine, in his or her judgment, to obtain the more immediate attention of the appropriate committee of the board or non-management director, of independent advisors or of Company management, as our Secretary considers appropriate.

Our Secretary may decide in the exercise of his or her judgment whether a response to any stockholder or interested party communication is necessary.

This procedure for stockholder and other interested party communications with the non-management directors is administered by the Company’s corporate governance and nominating committee. This procedure does not apply to (a) communications to non-management directors from officers or directors of the Company who are stockholders, (b) stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, or (c) communications to our audit committee pursuant to the Complaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters.

~~-18-~~-20-

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of our directors and director candidates and corporate governance policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition, our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers, and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating and Financial Officer, and other executive and senior financial officers. The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website at https://denalitherapeutics.com/investors in the Corporate Governance section of our Investor & Media Relations web page. We intend to post any amendments to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and any waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors and executive officers, on the same website.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our non-employee directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines to promote the ongoing alignment of the interests of our directors with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Our guidelines require that each non-employee director own a number of shares of our common stock or other qualifying Company equity with a value equal to at least three times such director’s annual cash retainer for service on our board, and maintain that minimum ownership throughout his or her tenure on our board. Each non-employee director is required to comply with our stock ownership guidelines by the later of April 16, 2026, which is the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the adoption of the guidelines, or the fifth anniversary of such director’s initial appointment or election to our board of directors. If the annual retainer for Board service is increased, each non-employee director will have until the later of the deadline in the prior sentence or two years from the date of such increase to satisfy the portion of the requirement attributable to the retainer increase. Until a non-employee director has satisfied the applicable level of ownership, and during any period in which the director ceases to satisfy the applicable level of ownership, such director may generally not sell or transfer more than fifty percent (50%) of the net shares received from any equity award granted to the non-employee director or derived from such director’s other direct holdings. At the discretion of our compensation committee, the stock ownership requirements may be waived for non-employee directors joining our board of directors from government, academia, or similar professions and may be temporarily suspended if the requirements would create severe hardship or prevent the non-employee director from complying with a court order.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our board of directors does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the board of directors as a whole, as well as through its standing committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. ~~In particular,~~

A summary of the key areas of risk oversight responsibility of our board of directors and each of its committees is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our audit committee is responsible for reviewing and discussing our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, includingset forth below:

-21-

Table of Contents


Board or Committee			Area of Risk Oversight
Board			Monitoring and assessing strategic risks Research and development activities, clinical development, drug safety and intellectual property *Risk management policies, guidelines and practices implemented by Company management
Audit Committee			* Financial, accounting, disclosure and corporate compliance, including the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, and oversight of internal and external audit Information security and cybersecurity risks Guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management Compliance with legal and regulatory requirements Related party transactions
Compensation Committee			*Compensation policies and practices, including whether such policies and practices balance risk-taking and rewards in an appropriate manner as discussed further below
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee			*Effectiveness of corporate governance guidelines, including board succession, director independence and potential conflicts of interest

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) section of this Proxy Statement describes our compensation policies, programs and practices for our named executive officers. Our goal-setting, performance assessment and ~~risk management. Our audit~~compensation decision-making processes described in the CD&A generally apply to all employees. In the CD&A, we describe compensation committee ~~also monitors compliance with legal~~ and ~~regulatory requirements and reviews related party transactions, in addition to oversight of the performance of~~independent compensation consultant involvement, which act as risk-mitigation controls for our ~~external audit function. Our corporate governance and nominating committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines.~~executive compensation programs. Our compensation committee ~~assesses~~also considers risks arising from the Company's compensation plans and ~~monitors~~arrangements more generally, including whether ~~any of our compensation policies~~these plans and programs ~~has the potential~~have or are likely to encourage excessive ~~risk-taking.~~risk taking. After consideration, our compensation committee determined that risks arising from the Company’s compensation plans and arrangements are not likely to give rise to a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Corporate Responsibility

Community

Denali Therapeutics supports the work of organizations that have complementary missions and are aligned with our therapeutic areas of interest. This includes advocacy organizations making a difference across the following disease areas: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, Lysosomal storage diseases such as MPS, Parkinson's disease, and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Workplace

At Denali we strive to create a work environment that supports employees in achieving both their personal and professional goals. Our working environment is guided by the core Denali values of trust, growth, grit and unity, and reinforced by developing quality leadership, fostering diversity and inclusion, and emphasizing continuous growth.

•Compensation. Our values-driven culture is complemented by an attractive total compensation package that is designed to motivate employees to perform to the best of their abilities; we believe this will, in turn, contribute to the value and success of our Company. Denali’s incentive plans serve to attract and retain employees through the granting of stock-based and cash-based compensation awards. Employees are eligible for annual bonuses that are tied to meeting individual and Company goals. We also offer a generous and flexible benefits package that helps our employees to take care of themselves and their families, which in turn enables them to devote their energies to defeating degeneration.

~~-19-~~-22-

Table of Contents

•Health and Safety. Our health and safety programs are designed around global standards with specifications addressing regulations, specific hazards, and the unique working environment of our operations. We mandate employee health and safety training and ergonomic assessments, and require specialized training for all lab-based employees. We conduct regular internal safety audits to ensure that proper safety policies and program procedures are in place. We conduct regular internal safety audits to ensure that proper safety policies and program procedures are in place. In addition, we engage both internal and third-party compliance assessments and audit selected operations for adherence to health and safety standards. Denali’s safety programs have been highly effective: since we commenced operations in 2015, we have had zero reportable regulatory safety incidents.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we created a Denali Continuity Team (DCT) responsible for COVID-related safety initiatives, including workplace social distancing directives, work from home guidance, and ensuring access to PPE and testing. DCT monitored local, state, and national guidance to ensure compliance and performed employee tracing. Despite the lab-based employees continuing to work in person, we had no confirmed inter-office COVID transmission cases in 2021 or 2022, based on adherence to our safety initiatives.

•Diversity and Inclusion. Denali embraces differences and acknowledges the valuable perspectives that a diverse and inclusive workforce brings to problem-solving and innovation. Our Unity in Diversity team spearheads action-oriented diversity programs, such as social responsibility through community leadership and volunteerism and creation of a safe place for expression and ideas. The Diversity team regularly invites prominent biotech leaders to speak at the company-wide meetings on issues of diversity within the scientific community; past topics have included access to health care in minority communities and the importance of patient diversity in clinical trials. Further, our STEM Outreach Program seeks to expand outreach to underrepresented minority groups by partnering with organizations such as the Bay Area Science Festival, Oakland REACH, and the Project Scientist Partnership.

As part of our plan to create a more inclusive workplace, we have adopted a zero tolerance policy towards harassment and discrimination and created safe avenues for employees to submit complaints, including a whistleblower hotline and a formal complaint system that facilitates direct reporting to our Human Resources Department.

•Training and Development. We believe training and development are an important part of creating a safe, productive, fair, and equitable environment. Each employee is assigned regular trainings that are relevant to either their specific role or broader corporate policies, such as cybersecurity best practices or insider trading prohibitions. Managers are given training to hone their supervisory skills and better support their employees’ development; they are, in turn, accountable for guiding the development of a personal and professional growth plan for each employee. For employees wishing to further develop their professional expertise, Denali offers education assistance for approved degree programs.

•Flexible Work Options. The global pandemic has accelerated our capabilities and culture with respect to flexible work arrangements. Denali values workplace flexibility and hybrid ways of working, and has introduced a policy which we believe balances more workplace flexibility with time together to collaborate and connect in person. We employ enhanced tools and technology designed to help us optimize productivity and collaboration while facilitating a hybrid work environment for our diverse workforce.

-23-

Table of Contents

Environment

At Denali, we strive to manage our operations is a way that is sustainable and reduces our impact on the environment. Denali has in place a Green Alternative program which provides researchers with information on suitable alternative chemicals that have a lower environmental impact for common solvents. Additionally, several waste streams have been segregated on-site for proper disposal or recycling, such as containers, food waste, plastics, styrofoam, and glass chemical containers, to maximize recycling and composting. Lab wastes have been routed from landfill disposal to waste-to-energy programs. Where feasible, we procure and use eco-conscious and compostable or reusable kitchen and office supplies. In addition, our permanent adoption of a hybrid remote work policy enables our employees to further reduce the environmental impact of their commutes.

Cybersecurity

Denali's approach to cybersecurity seeks to defend the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our systems and information for our people and our patients. Cybersecurity risk oversight is conducted by Denali’s Audit Committee. As part of the cybersecurity risk program the Audit Committee is briefed on a quarterly basis by the Head of IT with updates to the full board of directors as needed. Previously discussed topics have included identification of potential cyber threats, certain trending vulnerabilities and mitigation efforts associated with Denali's business and the potential impact to operations. The program considers the use of established cybersecurity frameworks, administrative (including policy, process, and awareness training), technical, and physical controls, and organizational communications. We conduct annual security awareness training, periodic simulated social engineering practices and have established protocols to escalate cybersecurity incidents from identification through remediation. Performance in cybersecurity controls for compliance-related systems are periodically reviewed by our internal audit functions as well as independent auditors. The Company currently carries cybersecurity insurance for certain security events. Within the last three years, we have not experienced any material information security breaches.

-24-

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our board of directors is currently composed of ~~ten (10)~~11 members. In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At the Annual Meeting, three Class IIII directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

Each director’s term continues until the election and qualification of such director’s successor, or such director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal. Any increase or decrease in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. This classification of our board of directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control of our ~~company.~~Company.

Nominees

Our corporate governance and nominating committee has recommended, and our board of directors has approved, ~~Douglas Cole, M.D., Jay Flatley, Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.,~~Ms. Cook, and ~~Nancy A. Thornberry~~Drs. Schenkein and Watts as nominees for election as Class I IIIdirectors at the Annual Meeting. If elected, each of ~~Dr. Cole, Mr. Flatley, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne~~Ms. Cook, and ~~Ms. Thornberry~~Drs. Schenkein and Watts, will serve as Class IIII directors until the ~~2024~~2026 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each of the nominees is currently a director of our ~~company.~~Company. For information concerning the nominees, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”

If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or vote over the Internet or by telephone but do not give instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares will be voted ~~FOR~~for the election of ~~Dr. Cole, Mr. Flatley, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne~~Ms. Cook, and ~~Ms. Thornberry.~~Drs. Schenkein and Watts. We expect that ~~Dr. Cole, Mr. Flatley, Dr. Tessier-Lavigne~~Ms. Cook, and ~~Ms. Thornberry~~Drs. Schenkein and Watts will accept such nomination; however, in the event that a director nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by our board of directors to fill such vacancy. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock and you do not give voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee, then your broker, bank, or other nominee will leave your shares unvoted on this matter.

Vote Required

The election of Class IIII directors requires a plurality vote of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to be approved. Accordingly, the three nominees receiving the highest number of votes cast “FOR” will be elected. Any shares voted “WITHHOLD” and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast for the foregoing purpose and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE ~~FOUR~~THREE DIRECTORS NOMINATED BY OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND NAMED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT AS CLASS III DIRECTORS TO SERVE FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM.

~~-20-~~-25-

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 2

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Our audit committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021.~~2023. Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2015.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders are being asked to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021.~~2023. Stockholder ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by our bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However, our board of directors is submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote, such appointment will be reconsidered by our audit committee. Even if the appointment is ratified, our audit committee, in its sole discretion, may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at any time during our fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021~~2023 if our audit committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of Denali and its stockholders. If the appointment is not ratified by our stockholders, the audit committee may reconsider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she wishes to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to us by Ernst & Young LLP for our fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 and ~~2019.~~2021.

2020 2019
Audit Fees(1)
$ 1,621,000 $ 1,185,000
Audit-Related Fees(2)
10,000 —
Tax Fees(3)
— 10,000
Total Fees $ 1,631,000 $ 1,195,000


	2022		2021
Audit Fees(1)	$	1,809,250	$	1,359,750
Audit-Related Fees(2)	—		—
Tax Fees(3)	—		—

Total Fees	$	1,809,250	$	1,359,750

(1)Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including internal control attestation, the review of interim financial statements, statutory audits, and related services that are normally provided in connection with registration statements, including comfort letters and consents. The Audit Fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 include fees associated with our follow-on offering completed in October 2022.

(2)Audit-Related Fees include fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements. There were no Audit-Related Fees incurred in 2022 or 2021.

(3)Tax Fees ~~consist of~~include fees billed for professional services ~~including permissible~~rendered by the principal accountant for tax ~~consulting~~compliance, tax advice, and ~~compliance.~~tax planning. There were no Tax Fees incurred in 2022 or 2021.

Auditor Independence

In ~~2020,~~2022, there were no other professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP that would have required our audit committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the independence of Ernst & Young LLP.

~~-21-~~-26-

Table of Contents

Audit Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Our audit committee has established a policy governing our use of the services of our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, our audit committee is required to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair such accounting firm’s independence. All fees paid to Ernst & Young LLP for our fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2019~~2021 and ~~2020~~2022 were pre-approved by our audit committee.

Vote Required

The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the proposal.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR OUR FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, ~~2021.~~2023.

~~-22-~~-27-

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

~~The~~In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), ~~allows~~and SEC rules, we are providing our stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. We are asking our stockholders to provide an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, along with the accompanying compensation tables and narrative ~~disclosures as described in this proxy statement.~~disclosures. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” ~~proposal,~~vote, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers.

The “say-on-pay” vote is advisory, and as such is not binding on the Company, but it does provide the compensation committee with valuable information regarding investor sentiment about ~~stockholder opinion of~~ our executive compensation policies and programs, ~~for consideration~~which our compensation committee will be able to consider when determining executive compensation in the future.

Please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the accompanying compensation tables and the narrative disclosures for greater detail about our executive compensation programs, including information about the fiscal year ~~2020~~2022 compensation of our named executive officers. We believe that our executive compensation programs have been effective in achieving long-term alignment of management and stockholder interests, consistent with the Company’s philosophy on pay and performance.

We ask that you vote “FOR” the following resolution:

RESOLVED: That the stockholders of Denali Therapeutics Inc. hereby approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and the narrative discussion, as disclosed in the proxy statement furnished for the ~~2021~~2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Vote Required

Approval, on an advisory basis, of named executive officer compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Unless otherwise indicated, proxies received will be voted “FOR” approval, on an advisory basis, of named executive officer compensation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

~~-23-~~-28-

Table of Contents

COMMITTEE REPORTS

The following reports of the compensation committee and audit committee do not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by Denali under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of ~~1934.~~1934, as amended, through any general statement incorporating by reference in its entirety the proxy statement in which the following reports appears, except to the extent that Denali specifically incorporates a committee report or a portion of it by reference in such filing.

Compensation Committee Report

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement with Denali’s management. Based on this review and discussion, the compensation committee has recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Denali’s proxy statement.

~~Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D. (Chairperson)~~

Jay Flatley (Chairperson)

~~Robert Nelsen~~Douglas Cole, M.D.

Nancy Thornberry

Audit Committee Report

The information contained in the following Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Denali Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company”) specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

The audit committee serves as the representative of our board of directors with respect to its oversight of:

•our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audit of our financial statements;

•the integrity of our consolidated financial statements;

•our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

•~~inquiring about significant risks,~~ reviewing our policies for risk assessment and risk management, and assessing the steps management has taken to control these ~~risks;~~risks, which includes oversight related to significant risks in the areas of finance, accounting, disclosure, corporate compliance, and cybersecurity; and

•the independent registered public accounting firm’s appointment, qualifications and independence.

The audit committee also reviews the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, in the annual audit of our financial statements and in assignments unrelated to the audit, and reviews the independent registered public accounting firm’s fees.

The audit committee is composed of three non-employee directors. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the audit committee is independent and that Mr. Klein qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the SEC rules.

~~-24-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The audit committee provides our board of directors such information and materials as it may deem necessary to make our board of directors aware of financial matters requiring the attention of our board of directors. The audit committee reviews our financial disclosures and meets privately, outside the presence of our management, with our independent registered public accounting firm. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the audit committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in our ~~2020~~2022 Annual Report with management, including a discussion of the quality and substance of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments made in connection with the audited financial statements, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The audit committee reports on these meetings to our board of directors.

-29-

Table of Contents

The audit committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with management and Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The audit committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”).

The audit committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence. In addition, the audit committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from management and the Company, including matters in the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with Ernst & Young LLP’s independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to our board of directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The audit committee also has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2021.~~2023. Our board of directors recommends that stockholders ratify this selection at the Annual Meeting.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the audit committee of the board of directors:

Peter Klein (Chairperson)

Jay Flatley

~~Douglas Cole, M.D.~~Erik Harris

~~-25-~~-30-

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information about our named executive officers (collectively, our "NEOs") and their respective ages as of March 31, ~~2021.~~2023. Officers are elected by the board of directors to hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.

Name

Age

Position

Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.

4547

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Steve E. Krognes(1)

Former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.

4749

Chief Operating and Financial Officer, and Secretary

~~Steve E. Krognes~~

~~Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer~~

Carole Ho, M.D.

4850

Chief Medical Officer

(1)Mr. Krognes transitioned from his role as Chief Financial Officer and joined our board of directors as of May 1, 2022.

For the ~~biography~~biographies of Dr. Watts and Mr. Krognes, see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—~~Continuing Directors.~~Nominees for Director.”

Alexander O. Schuth, M.D. is one of our co-founders and has served as our Chief Operating Officer since March 2015 and as Secretary since June 2015. On March 14, 2022, the Board appointed Dr. Schuth to the role of Chief Financial Officer, effective as of May 1, 2022. As of this date, Dr. Schuth became the Company’s Chief Operating and Financial Officer, and retained his role as Secretary of the Company.

Dr. Schuth co-founded and joined Denali from Genentech, where he held various roles of increasing responsibility between 2005 and 2015; from September 2014 to March 2015, Dr. Schuth served as Head of Technology Innovation and Diagnostics Partnering; from March 2010 to September 2014, Dr. Schuth served as Head of Neuroscience Partnering; from January 2007 to March 2010, Dr. Schuth worked in the business development team; and from August 2005 to January 2007, Dr. Schuth worked as an R&D finance manager. From January 2001 to May 2003, he served as Investment Banking Associate in the equity capital markets group at Merrill Lynch in London. He currently serves on the board of directors of Molecular Health, a privately held biopharmaceutical company. Dr. Schuth received his M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and his M.D. from the Charite Medical School at the Humboldt University in Berlin, Germany.

~~Steve E. Krognes~~ has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 2015 and Treasurer since November 2015. Mr. Krognes joined Denali from Genentech, where he served as Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Executive Committee from April 2009 to September 2015. Mr. Krognes also oversaw Genentech’s Site Services organization between 2011 and 2015, and Genentech’s IT organization between 2009 and 2011. He chaired the Genentech Access to Care Foundation between 2009 and 2015. From January 2004 to April 2009, Mr. Krognes served as Head of Mergers & Acquisitions and a member of the Finance Executive Committee at Roche, a Swiss biotechnology company. From July 2002 to December 2003, Mr. Krognes served as Director of M&A at Danske Bank based in Norway. Mr. Krognes currently serves as a member of the boards of directors of Corvus Pharmaceuticals, a biopharmaceutical company, RLS Global, a Swedish life science company, and Gritstone Oncology, a biotechnology company. Mr. Krognes served as a board member of the California Life Science Association between 2010 and 2015 and California Academy of Sciences from 2014 to 2018. He received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and his B.S. in Economics from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

~~-26-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Carole Ho, M.D. has served as our Chief Medical Officer and Head of Development since June 2015. Dr. Ho joined Denali from Genentech, where she held various roles of increasing responsibility between 2007 and 2015; from October 2014 to June 2015, Dr. Ho served as Vice President, Non-Oncology Early Clinical Development; from November 2013 to October 2014, Dr. Ho served as Senior Group Medical Director, Early Clinical Development; from April 2011 to November 2013, Dr. Ho served as Group Medical Director, Early Clinical Development; from June 2009 to April 2011, Dr. Ho served as Group Medical Director Global Product Development (Inflammation); and from October 2007 to June 2009, Dr. Ho served as Medical Director, Early Clinical Development. From November 2006 to October 2007, Dr. Ho served as Associate Medical Director at Johnson & Johnson, a health care products company. From June 2002 to November 2006, she was an instructor in the Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences at Stanford University. Dr. Ho completed a residency in neurology at Partners Neurology Residency of the Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and was board certified in neurology and psychiatry between 2004 and 2014. Dr. Ho currently serves on the ~~board~~boards of directors of Beam Therapeutics and NGM Biopharmaceutics Inc. Dr. Ho received her M.D. from Cornell University and her B.S. in Biochemical Sciences from Harvard College.

~~-27-~~-31-

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In this Compensation, Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), we provide an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and objectives as well as a description of the material components of our executive compensation program for our named executive officers (“NEOs,” also referred to in this CD&A as our “executives” or our “executive officers”). This CD&A is intended to be read in conjunction with the tables which immediately follow this section, which provide further historical compensation information.

Executive Summary

~~Company Background and 2020 Business Highlights~~

Our goal is to discover, develop, and deliver therapeutics to defeat degeneration. We are developing a broad portfolio of targeted therapeutic candidates for neurodegenerative and lysosomal storage diseases. Our programs are at different stages of clinical and preclinical development, including ~~five programs in clinical studies.~~seven clinical-stage programs. We have also developed a proprietary blood-brain barrier ~~("BBB")~~(BBB) platform technology, our transport vehicle ~~("TV")~~(TV), which enables multiple modality-based platforms to deliver a wide range of large-molecule therapeutics across the BBB, including enzymes, antibodies, proteins, and oligonucleotides. WeCurrently, three of our seven clinical-stage programs are ~~currently optimizing and broadening this platform~~enabled by our TV technology.

~~We made significant progress with~~In 2022 we expanded and progressed our late-stage and early-stage portfolio of product candidates for neurodegenerative and ~~TV platform technology~~lysosomal storage diseases. Some 2022 business milestones include:

•Advanced our late-stage product candidates:

◦BIIB122/DNL151 (LRRK2 inhibitor): Parkinson’s disease (idiopathic and LRRK2-positive) -Our partner, Biogen, announced the initiation of two global, late-stage clinical trials in ~~2020:~~

•~~We entered into a broad collaboration agreement with Biogen (as defined below) on our LRRK2 program for~~ Parkinson's disease patients with and ~~certain TV platform-enabled programs for neurodegenerative diseases,~~without a confirmed pathogenic mutation in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene.

◦DNL310 (ETV:IDS): MPS II (Hunter syndrome) - We continued to enroll patients with Hunter syndrome, with and ~~received upfront payments totaling $1.025 billion related~~without neuronopathic disease, in the global Phase 2/3 COMPASS study. We also shared additional, one-year interim data from the ongoing Phase 1/2 study, which continued to ~~this collaboration~~show rapid and sustained normalization to healthy levels of CSF heparan sulfate and improvements in biomarkers of lysosomal function consistent with durable CNS activity, and the ~~associated equity investment;~~safety profile with up to 85 weeks of dosing remained consistent with standard of care therapy. In addition, one-year exploratory outcomes data from clinician and caregiver global impression scales of change suggested that the majority of participants in the Phase 1/2 study improved or stabilized compared to baseline.

•◦DNL343 (eIF2B activator): Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) - We ~~completed enrollment~~announced DNL343 interim phase 1b data in ALS and entry into the Phase 2/3 HEALEY ALS platform trial.

◦SAR443820/DNL788 (CNS-penetrant RIPK1 inhibitor): ALS, Multiple Sclerosis - Our collaborator Sanofi, commenced dosing in the HIMALAYA Phase 2 study in patients with ALS, for which Denali received a $40.0 million milestone payment.

-32-

Table of Contents

•Expanded our ~~first patient~~early and mid-stage product candidate portfolio:

◦DNL593 (PTV:PGRN): GRN Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD-GRN) - The Clinical Trial Application (CTA) for TAK-594/DNL593 (PTV:PGRN) was approved by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), for which Denali received a $12.0 million milestone payment from Takeda. We initiated a Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial of TAK-594/DNL593 for FTD-GRN and subsequently announced that interim results from Part A of the Phase 1/2 study demonstrated that single doses of TAK-594/DNL593 resulted in substantial increases in CSF progranulin levels. These results suggest that brain delivery of TAK-594/DNL593 was achieved and has the potential to address progranulin deficiency, which drives disease progression in people living with FTD-GRN. Single doses of TAK-594/DNL593 were also generally well tolerated, based on blinded safety analysis.

◦DNL919 (ATV:TREM2): Alzheimer's disease - The CTA for ~~DNL151,~~TAK-920/DNL919 (ATV:TREM2) was approved, for which Denali received a potent, selective and brain-penetrant small molecule inhibitor of LRRK2 under investigation for treatment of Parkinson’s disease, and together with Biogen, selected this molecule to progress into late-stage development;

•$12.0 million milestone payment from Takeda. We commenced dosing in a Phase ~~1/2 clinical trial~~1 single ascending dose study of ~~DNL310 in Hunter syndrome patients, and announced that biomarker proof of concept for the TV platform technology was achieved in the Phase 1/2 trial after four weekly doses of DNL310;~~

•~~We initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial~~TAK-920/DNL919 in healthy volunteers in the Netherlands. We announced that the IND application for ~~DNL343, a brain penetrant small molecule designed to activate EIF2B function in ALS and Frontotemporal dementia;~~TAK-920/DNL919 was placed on clinical hold by the FDA.

•Other milestones:

◦SAR443122/DNL758 (peripherally-restricted RIPK1 inhibitor): Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE), Ulcerative Colitis (UC) - Our collaboration partner Sanofi ~~completed a Phase 1b clinical trial in hospitalized adult~~continued to enroll patients with ~~severe COVID-19 lung disease~~CLE in the Phase 2 study of SAR443122/DNL758 ~~(SAR443122), a peripherally-restricted small molecule inhibitor of RIPK1. DNL758 (SAR443122) was found to be generally well tolerated~~ and ~~resulted in changes in disease relevant biomarkers and clinical outcome trends consistent with the proof of mechanism;~~

•~~Our collaboration partner Sanofi~~ commenced dosing of ~~DNL788 (SAR443820), a potent, selective brain-penetrant small molecule inhibitor of RIPK1,~~patients with UC in a Phase ~~1 clinical trial~~2 study of SAR443122/ DNL758, the latter triggering a $10.0 million milestone payment, which was received in ~~healthy volunteers; and~~December 2022.

•◦We sold ~~9.0~~11.9 million shares of common stock through an underwritten public offering at a price of ~~$23.00~~$26.50 per share for aggregate net proceeds of ~~$193.9~~$296.2 million.

~~-28-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

In addition, we advanced multiple early-stage programs, including programs enabled by our TV platform technology, and made progress on other corporate goals that advance our goal of defeating degeneration. Our progress and success of 2020 was reflected in our share price performance during the year as well, with our share price climbing over 380% during the year.

~~2020~~2022 Compensation Highlights

Consistent with our compensation philosophy focusing on pay for performance, our compensation committee structured executive pay in ~~2020~~2022 to ensure alignment with the interests of our stockholders while incentivizing the pursuit of important strategic business goals. Highlights include:

•Base ~~salary~~ -salaries – We made moderate adjustments to ~~2020~~2022 base salaries of our executives based on our review of roles, responsibilities and market practices;

•Annual ~~bonus~~ -bonuses – Our ~~strong results and performance in 2020 was reflected in our~~ annual bonus ~~achievements~~incentives were based on metrics and ~~payouts. Our committee set ambitious stretch goals for 2020 that were identified as~~milestones pertaining to critical measures of our corporate strategy as well as drivers of our long-term goal of creating stockholder value. ~~We impressively~~In 2022 we met 1915 of our 20 objective goals, ~~which covered our clinical-stage programs, our seed/pathway/platform/preclinical programs, and several key corporate-level financial and operational achievements. As a result, our 2020~~resulting in an annual bonus paid out at ~~200%~~100% of target; and

•Equity grants – Consistent with our granting practices of recent years, we granted stock options and restricted stock units ("RSUs") to our executive officers in ~~2020~~2022 to motivate and retain our executives, while aligning their interests with those of our long-term stockholders.

How weWe Pay For Performance

Our pay ~~for performance~~

~~To help ensure we use~~program focuses on rewarding executives while keeping a ~~robust approach to our pay-setting process we examine overall~~significant portion of compensation ~~in several ways. First, we~~at-risk. We consider the compensation mix, including the mix of variable and fixed pay as well as how much compensation is long-term oriented. ~~In addition to looking at our business objectives we also look at how pay for our CEO is aligned with another measure, total stockholder return ("TSR").~~

-33-

Table of Contents

Target ~~pay~~Pay

~~Our pay program focuses on rewarding executives while keeping a significant portion of compensation at-risk.~~ The compensation committee uses its discretion in determining the appropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation for each NEO. The chosen compensation vehicles include short-term and long-term incentives, and cash and equity compensation. The balance between these components may change from year to year based on corporate strategy and objectives, among other considerations. Our target total compensation mix shown below is as reported in the summary compensation table and consists of base salary, actual bonus paid and the grant date fair value of equity awards, which includes stock options and RSUs. For ~~2020,~~2022, our CEO and NEOs had the following target pay mix:

~~-29-~~

~~Table~~Note: NEO Target Pay Mix only includes executives who served for the entirety of ~~Contents~~the past fiscal year.

Compensation Aligned with Performance

The magnitude of CEO compensation is directly aligned with our ~~company~~Company performance through the relationship between stock price and the grant date fair value of equity awards.

Consideration of Say-on-Pay Results and Stockholder Engagement

At our 2022 annual meeting, our advisory vote on executive compensation (commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote), received the support of approximately 94.4% of the shares voted. The compensation committee believes this vote demonstrated ~~by the alignment~~our stockholders’ positive view of our ~~CEO pay~~pay-for-performance philosophy and ~~indexed TSR, as shown below. Indexed TSR is one way of displaying~~ the ~~cumulative total stockholder return~~appropriateness of our ~~common stock, which assumes an investment of $100~~executive compensation structure. Therefore, the compensation committee did not make any changes to ~~have been made in~~ our ~~common stock on January 1, 2018 and tracks our relative stock price performance through December 31, 2020. All values assume reinvestment~~compensation program directly as a result of the ~~full amount of all dividends, however no dividends have been declared on our common stock~~say-on-pay vote result.

While pleased with the vote result, the Company continues to ~~date.~~

~~Stockholder Engagement~~

~~The company is~~be committed to ~~engagement~~engaging with stockholders. We review any feedback we receive from our stockholders about our executive compensation program to ensure that we understand key matters of interest to them, and to enable us to take that feedback into consideration for our compensation decisions.

Compensation Philosophy

Our compensation committee believes a well-designed compensation program should align executive interests with the drivers of growth and stockholder returns by supporting the Company’s achievement of its primary business goals, and the Company’s ability to attract and retain employees whose talents, expertise, leadership, and contributions are expected to sustain growth in long-term stockholder value. Consequently, we maintain an ongoing commitment to corporate governance principles and strong performance orientation in our compensation program. Our compensation committee regularly reviews our compensation policies and program design overall, to ensure that they are aligned with the interests of our stockholders and our business goals, and that the total compensation paid to our employees and directors is fair, reasonable and competitive.

~~-30-~~-34-

Table of Contents

Over time, we have made gradual changes to our executive compensation program to adopt practices that are appropriate for the ~~company~~Company given our business, industry, growth and other factors. Our compensation committee and board of directors believe it appropriate to continue to fine tune our executive compensation program but generally have avoided dramatic changes since we became a publicly traded ~~company.~~Company. We engaged an independent compensation consultant prior to our initial public offering to assist our compensation committee in determining executive compensation and have continued to work with ~~our~~an independent compensation consultant to review and update our executive compensation program.

~~Consideration of Say on Pay Vote Results~~

At our 2020 annual meeting, we held our first non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation (commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay” vote). This say-on-pay received overwhelming support from our stockholders, with over 99% of votes cast in support of the proposal (excluding broker non-votes and abstentions). The compensation committee believes this vote demonstrated our stockholders’ positive view of our pay-for-performance philosophy and the appropriateness of our executive compensation structure.

In addition, at the 2020 annual meeting, we asked that our stockholders recommend, on an advisory basis, that we begin to hold future say-on-pay votes either annually, every two years or every three years. Of the votes cast, there was a very close split in favor of annual say-on-pay votes and say-on-pay votes every three years, with a slight preference indicated for an annual say-on-pay vote. After consideration of our stockholders’ income, and decided, as was recommended with respect to this proposal by the Company’s board of directors in the proxy statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting, that we will hold future say-on-pay votes on an annual basis until the occurrence of the next advisory vote on the frequency of say on pay votes, which is required to occur no later than our 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Compensation Determination Process

Role of the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors

Our compensation committee is responsible for overseeing the total compensation of our executive officers. In this capacity, our compensation committee designs, implements, reviews and approves all compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers. The compensation committee formally met four times during fiscal year ~~2020,~~2022, and also met informally on several occasions, to review and discuss matters related to compensation of our employees and executive officers. Some of these meetings (or portions of these meetings) were held with members of management in attendance and some (or portions of these meetings) were held in closed session. Most of the meetings also included representatives from our compensation consultant (as described below). Typically, the compensation committee reports to the Board on its discussions and on occasion recommends to the Board, or seeks input from the Board regarding, the decisions to be made and other actions to be taken with regard to our executive officers’ compensation. Our compensation committee’s recommendations regarding executive compensation are based on the compensation committee’s assessment of the performance of the Company and each individual executive officer, as well as other factors, such as prevailing industry trends and the competitive market for executive talent. The compensation committee typically makes the final decisions regarding executive compensation.

~~-31-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Role of Management

Our CEO, Chief Operating and Financial Officer (“~~CFO”~~COFO”), and Chief People Officer (“CPO”) typically make recommendations to our compensation committee, attend certain compensation committee meetings and are involved in the process for determining our executive officers’ compensation, provided that none of our CEO, ~~CFO~~COFO or CPO makes recommendations as to their own compensation or participates in compensation committee discussion of their own compensation. Our compensation committee considers management’s recommendations but is not required to follow any recommendations and may adjust compensation up or down as it determines in its discretion. Our compensation committee reviews the recommendations and other data and makes recommendations to the Board as to each executive officer’s total compensation, as well as each individual pay component.

Use of Independent Compensation Consultant

The compensation committee has authority to appoint and retain a compensation consultant. The fees for services rendered by the compensation consultant are paid by the Company. For the first half of fiscal year ~~2020,~~2022, our compensation committee engaged ~~Radford, which is part of the Rewards~~Aon’s Human Capital Solutions practice, ata division of Aon plc (“Aon”), as its independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters including: overall compensation program design, peer group development and updates, and collecting market data to inform our compensation programs for our executives and members of our board of directors. We

Beginning in September 2022, the compensation committee engaged Alpine Rewards (“Alpine”) as its independent compensation consultant. Alpine has helped to further develop our compensation programs ~~after reviewing publicly available compensation data~~ and ~~we also subscribe to Radford’s various global annual and specialized life sciences and general industry surveys on an ongoing basis. Radford~~has advised the compensation committee on all of the principal aspects of executive compensation. ~~Radford consultants attend meetings~~

-35-

Table of ~~the compensation committee when requested to do so. Radford~~Contents

Alpine reports, and Aon had reported, directly to our compensation committee and not to management, although itAon had met, and Alpine meets, with management for purposes of gathering information for its analyses and recommendations. Our compensation committee ~~has~~ assessed the independence of ~~Radford~~each of Aon and Alpine consistent with Nasdaq listing standards and ~~has~~ concluded that ~~the~~neither engagement ~~of Radford does not raise~~raised or raises any conflict of interest.

Use of a Peer Group

The compensation committee approves a peer group of companies as a reference group to provide a broad perspective on competitive pay levels and practices. The peers are reviewed on an annual basis in light of the fast-moving changes at Denali and our industry. ~~We undertake~~

In August 2021, we undertook this review with the assistance and recommendations of ~~Radford, the Committee’s compensation consultant.~~

~~In August 2019,~~Aon, the compensation ~~committee approved a peer group for use in making 2020~~committee’s compensation ~~decisions.~~consultant at the time. The compensation committee used the following criteria in determining the appropriate peers:

•Industry Sector and Stage – ~~Pre-commercial~~Publicly traded pre-commercial biopharmaceutical companies with a focus on companies with programs in Phase 1 or 2 of clinical development, while also incorporating more mature, commercially oriented biopharma companies.

•Market Capitalization – Range of ~~$600 million~~$3.0 billion to ~~$6.0~~$15.0 billion ~~(a range relative to on Denali’s market value of approximately $2.0 billion at the time of assessment, approximately 0.3x to 3.0x Denali’s then current market value)~~

•~~Employee Headcount~~ ~~– Between 40 and 500 employees~~

•Location – Biotechnology hub markets (San Francisco Bay Area, San Diego, Boston, etc.)

•~~Public Tenure~~Headcount – ~~Preference for companies that have been public less than five years~~Companies with above 100 employees

~~-32-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~2020~~2022 Peer Group

Based on these criteria and considerations, our ~~2020~~2022 peer group ~~as approved by our Compensation Committee consisted~~was determined to consist of the following companies:

Agios Pharmaceuticals

CRISPR Therapeutics

REGENXBIO

Alector

~~Agios Pharmaceuticals~~Editas Medicine

~~Alder BioPharmaceuticals~~

Alector*Sage Therapeutics*

Allakos

~~Allakos~~ Fate Therapeutics

Allogene Therapeutics*

~~AnaptysBio~~Sangamo Therapeutics

Allogene Therapeutics

~~Atara Biotherapeutics~~

~~Audentes Therapeutics~~

~~CRISPR Therapeutics~~

~~CytomX Therapeutics~~

~~Editas Medicine~~

Global Blood Therapeutics

Sarepta Therapeutics*

Arcus Biosciences

Gossamer Bio*Ionis Pharmaceuticals*

~~MacroGenics~~

Mirati Therapeutics*Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical

Arvinas

Moderna*Mirati Therapeutics

~~MyoKardia~~

NGM Biopharmaceuticals*Vir Biotechnology

Atara Biotherapeutics

~~Portola Pharmaceuticals~~NGM Biopharmaceuticals

~~Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical~~

~~Voyager Therapeutics~~Zogenix

Biohaven Pharmaceutical*

Xencor*

Zogenix*

Reata Pharmaceuticals

• ~~New for 2020~~

As a result of the determination of the ~~2020~~2022 peer group based on the revised criteria, ~~eight~~three companies that had been included in the ~~2019~~2021 peer group were removed as they no longer met the criteria listed above: ~~Aduro BioTech, Assembly Biosciences, Five Prime Therapeutics, Prothena, Sage Therapeutics, Seres Therapeutics, Spark Therapeutics~~Gossamer Bio, MyoKardia, and ~~Unity Biotechnology.~~Xencor.

~~2021~~2023 Peer Group

In August ~~2020,~~2022, the compensation committee approved the peer group for use in making ~~2021~~2023 compensation decisions. Due to changes in the Company’s profile, the Committee made updates to the peer selection criteria related to market capitalization, ~~size~~sector and ~~public tenure,~~stage, as well as consideration for recent acquisitions.

The Committee determined to that ~~eight~~seven companies should be removed as they no longer met the criteria: ~~AnaptsyBio, CytomX, MacroGenics, Moderna, Voyager Therapeutics; in addition, Alder, Audentes~~Allakos, Atara Biotherapeutics, Biohaven Pharmaceutical, Editas Medicine, Sangamo Therapeutics, and ~~Portola were removed due to recent acquisitions.~~Zogenix.

-36-

Table of Contents

The Committee added the following companies to the ~~2021~~2023 peer group: ~~ArcusBiosciences, Arvinas, Reata Pharmaceuticals, REGENXBIO, Sangamo~~Beam Therapeutics, Cerevel Therapeutics, Cytokinetics, Intellia Therapeutics, Karuna Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, and ~~Vir Biotechnology.~~Verve Therapeutics.

In setting compensation for our executive officers, including our NEOs, the compensation committee uses competitive compensation data from an annual total compensation study of selected peer companies and relevant survey sources to inform its decisions about overall compensation opportunities and specific compensation elements.However, the ~~Committee~~compensation committee uses our compensation peer group as one data point when setting executive pay packages. The compensation philosophy focuses at or near a target percentile for base salary, particularly in respect to target cash compensation and equity grants. In addition, our compensation decisions are based on the consideration of many factors, including, but not limited to, individual and ~~company~~Company performance, market data, internal equity, experience, and strategic needs. As a result of evaluating compensation based on the criteria described above, total target compensation for our NEOs may in certain circumstances be above or below the median levels of the peer group.

~~-33-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Pay Components

The Company’s executive compensation program consists of three primary elements: base salaries, annual cash incentives, and long-term equity awards:

Element

Purpose

Features

Base Salary

To attract and retain highly skilled executives

•Fixed component of pay to provide financial stability, based on responsibilities, experience, individual contributions and peer company data

Annual Cash ~~Incentive Program~~Incentives

To promote and reward the achievement of key short-term strategic and business goals of the ~~company~~Company as well as individual performance; to motivate and attract executives

•Variable component of pay based on annual quantitative and qualitative performance assessment against objectives related to clinical testing, pipeline and functional goals

Equity Incentive Compensation

To encourage executives and other employees to focus on long-term company performance; to promote retention; to reward outstanding company and individual performance

•Delivered in the form of stock options and RSUs, subject to multi-year vesting based on continued service. The value of these awards depends on the performance of our common stock price, ~~in order to align~~which aligns employee and executive interests with those of our stockholders over the longer term

Denali is committed to a strong performance orientation in our compensation program and effective corporate governance practices for a company at our development stage and industry. As such we routinely review our policies and program design. Some of our best practices in governance that we observe include:

-37-

Table of Contents

What We Do

•Align compensation with stockholder interests

•Balance pay mix of fixed and variable pay

•Align pay with performance

•Adopt robust anti-hedging and pledging policies

•Use a peer group to benchmark pay

•Retain a compensation consultant

~~Align compensation with stockholder interests~~

~~Balanced pay mix of fixed and variable pay~~

~~Align pay with performance~~

~~Robust anti-hedging and pledging policies~~

~~Use a peer group to benchmark pay~~

~~Retain a compensation consultant~~What We Don't Do

~~What We Don't Do~~

•Guarantee bonuses

~~Guaranteed bonuses~~

•Provide excessive perquisites

•Provide excessive severance payments

•Provide excise tax gross ups

Base Salary

Base salary is the only fixed component of our executive officers’ total cash compensation and provides competitive pay to attract and retain our executives. Annual salary decisions are made in recognition of competitive data as well as the skills and experience that each individual brings to the Company and the performance contributions each makes.

Base salary changes in ~~2020~~2022 varied by executive due either to merit increases or market adjustments. Other factors were considered such as tenure, experience and the role of the individual. A portion of the increases to NEO base salaries in 2022 were made to ensure that base salaries of our NEOs are in alignment with peers and, with respect to our Chief Operating and Financial Officer, reflect the additional responsibilities associated with this combined position.

~~-34-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Annual base salaries for our NEOs were as follows:

Executive 2019 2020 Annual Increase
Ryan J. Watts, Ph. D. $ 566,800 $ 589,472 4.0 %
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D. $ 428,000 $ 449,400 5.0 %
Steve E. Krognes $ 470,057 $ 484,200 3.0 %
Carole Ho, M.D. $ 440,000 $ 457,600 4.0 %


Executive	2021		2022		Annual Increase
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	$	610,100	$	645,000	5.7	%
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	$	465,100	$	500,000	7.5	%
Steve E. Krognes(1)	$	501,200	$	501,200	—	%
Carole Ho, M.D.	$	473,600	$	500,000	5.6	%

(1)On May 1, 2022, Mr. Krognes transitioned from his role as Chief Financial Officer to join our Board of Directors as a non-employee member. For 2022, the actual base salary paid to him for his employment was 167,067.

Annual Cash Incentives

The Annual Cash Incentive Program (Bonus Plan) is designed to provide a financial incentive to reward executives for the achievement of a series of program specific, pipeline and functional corporate goals. Payments under the plan are ultimately based on achievement of these pre-established corporate goals. Actual performance against targets, as measured by these pre-established corporate goals, funds the incentive payouts. The bonus pool can be funded between 0% to a maximum of ~~150%~~175% of target funding levels, but the compensation committee has the discretion to go beyond the expected high end of the range to 200%. The total bonus payout cannot exceed the total amount of funding in the pool. Bonuses are typically paid in the quarter following the end of the performance period and bonuses to our NEOs are subject to the terms of our Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, under which our compensation committee has broad discretion to increase, decrease or eliminate the funding of the bonus pool and the amounts payable as individual bonuses.

-38-

Table of Contents

Bonuses for all employees, including our NEOs, for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022, were allocated from a bonus pool funded based on performance against a number of high impact, stretch project and cross-function goals. The project goals related to specific programs, trials and pipeline progress, including goals for clinical stage programs as well as seed, pathway, platform, and preclinical goals. The cross-function goals included goals related to ~~business development, financing,~~major strategic collaborations, data collection, interpretation and sharing, growing core skills, and building key capabilities in a way that reflects Denali’s values and supports our portfolio, establishing capabilities for successful commercialization, raising funds through equity issuances and/or new partnerships, intellectual property ~~business continuity, positioning for future growth~~ and ~~development~~invention, work environment, and other functional goals. Most of the cross-functional goals involved multiple steps geared toward driving advancement of key Company initiatives. The combination of the project and cross-function goals was intended to drive both specific technical achievement and continue to build the foundation for future Company growth and advancements. Based on the diversity and difficulty of these goals, in structuring the funding expectations at the beginning of the year, the ~~compensation committee~~Company believed that achievement of 70% of these challenging goals would be difficult, requiring focused effort and diligence, and would represent strong alignment with the Company’s business objectives that would make bonus pool funding at 100% levels appropriate. In addition, in determining the CEO's 2022 bonus, the compensation committee considered specific areas of focus for the CEO related to the broader project and cross-function goals as well as leadership and development and the CEO’s key accomplishments for the year.

Each goal is measured individually, and the percent of goals achieved determines the bonus payout, subject to the compensation committee's discretion to alter bonus funding and payouts:


% of Goals Achieved	25%	40%	50%	60%	70%	80%	90%	100% and/or Major value driver (e.g. Phase 3, Drug Approval)
% Pool Funding	0%	25%	50%	75%	100%	125%	150%	175 - 200%

In ~~February 2021,~~January 2023, the compensation committee of our board of directors reviewed the progress against the applicable ~~2020~~2022 goals. Based on the Company’s achievement of ~~95%~~75% of these aggressive goals, plus the achievement of major value drivers, including the execution of the collaboration agreement with Biogen and the achievement of biomarker proof of concept for the TV platform technology, and recognition from management of a strong year, the compensation committee funded the bonus pool at ~~200%~~100% of target levels. The resulting bonuses to NEOs were as follows:


Executive	2022 Base Salary		Annual Target Bonus (% of base)		Funding Percentage		2022 Earned Award
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	$	645,000	60	%	100	%	$	387,000
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	$	500,000	45	%	100	%	$	225,000
Steve E. Krognes(1)	$	501,200	40	%	n/a		n/a
Carole Ho, M.D.	$	500,000	45	%	100	%	$	225,000

~~-35-~~

~~Table~~(1)On May 1, 2022, Mr. Krognes transitioned from his role as Chief Financial Officer to join our Board of ~~Contents~~

Executive 2020 Base Salary Annual Target Bonus (% of base) Goal Achievement 2020 Earned Award
Ryan J. Watts, Ph. D. $ 589,472 55 % 200 % $ 648,419
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D. $ 449,400 40 % 200 % $ 359,520
Steve E. Krognes $ 484,200 40 % 200 % $ 387,360
Carole Ho, M.D. $ 457,600 40 % 200 % $ 366,080
Directors.

Long-Term Incentives

In ~~2020,~~2022, we granted our executives’ target equity compensation in the form of time-vesting RSUs and stock options. In determining the awards vehicles, the compensation committee considers the appropriate split of such equity awards, including the balancing of incentives and retention needs, stockholder dilution and equity plan share reserve management.

In ~~early 2020,~~late 2021, the compensation committee approved the annual equity grants for 2022, which became effective in January 2022, which were split at a ~~70/30~~60/40 ratio between stock options and RSUs. In ~~August, to further incentivize~~addition, eligibility for Denali's Peak Achievement Award ("PAA") program is evaluated company-wide and ~~retain our leadership team, executives were granted further equity, consisting entirely of RSUs. The 2020~~includes NEOs, other than Dr. Watts, whose performance merits an additional award. These awards are granted as part of the normal granting cycle each August. The compensation committee approved PAA grants in the form of RSUs for Dr. Schuth and Dr. Ho and certain other key employees of the company in August 2022.

-39-

Table of Contents

Equity granted to our executives in 2022 are detailed below and in the section "Grants of Plan-Based Awards".:


	RSUs				Options
Executive		Number Granted	Grant Date Fair Value		Number Granted	Grant Date Fair Value
Ryan J. Watts, Ph. D.		62,000	$	2,930,740	186,500	$	5,309,748
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.		53,500	$	2,307,095	93,000	$	2,647,757
Steve E. Krognes(1)		31,000	$	1,465,370	93,000	$	2,647,757
Carole Ho, M.D.		53,500	$	2,307,095	93,000	$	2,647,757

(1)On May 1, 2022, Mr. Krognes transitioned from his role as Chief Financial Officer to join our Board of Directors. According to the terms of his transition, all stock and option awards granted to Mr. Krognes during the year ended December 31, 2022 were forfeited when he ceased to be an employee of the Company.

Severance and Change in Control Protections

~~In November 2017, we adopted~~We maintain a Key Executive Change in Control and Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”) in which our NEOs participate. The Severance Plan provides participants with severance in the event of certain qualifying terminations, including following a change in control of our ~~company,~~Company, and certain change in control benefits. We believe that these protections are necessary to provide our valuable executives with incentives to forego other employment opportunities and remain employed with us and to maintain continued focus and dedication to their responsibilities to maximize stockholder value, including if there is a potential transaction that could involve a change in control. In addition, these protections are available only if a named executive officer executes and does not revoke a general release of claims in favor of us. The terms and levels of benefits provided to our NEOs under the Severance Plan were determined by our compensation committee, with input from our management team, and approved by our board following a review of analysis prepared by ~~Radford~~Aon of relevant market data for other companies with whom we compete for executive talent, and are reviewed, and the analysis refreshed, from time to time. In October 2020, after review and consideration of a new analysis prepared by Radford of relevant market data and retention and incentive considerations, the compensation committee determined that the cash severance payable under the Severance Plan to our CEO upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control should be increased to better align with the level of benefits offered by our peers, and to better meet the goals of the Severance Plan.

For a summary of the material terms of the benefits provided to our NEOs under the Severance Plan, ~~including the modifications made in October 2020 with respect to our CEO,~~ and an estimate of the payments and benefits that may be received by our NEOs under the Severance Plan, see “Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control” below.

Additional Policies and Practices

Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions

The Company has implemented robust policies that bar employees from hedging and pledging our stock. NEOs are prohibited from pledging Company securities as collateral for loans, doing so would be a violation of the Company’s Insider Trading Policy.

Additionally, employees are barred from engaging in transactions in publicly-traded options, such as puts and calls, and other derivative securities with respect to the Company’s securities. This prohibition extends to any hedging or similar transaction designed to decrease the risks associated with holding Company securities. There are limited exceptions to the hedging and pledging prohibitions, however they must be approved by a Compliance Officer, in consultation with the board of directors or an independent committee of the board of directors.

~~-36-~~-40-

Table of Contents

Accounting and Tax Considerations

The Company accounts for equity-based compensation paid to employees under FASB ASC Topic 718, which requires the Company to estimate and record an expense over the service period of an award. Thus, the Company may record an expense in one year for awards granted in earlier years. Accounting rules also require the recording of cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is incurred.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") generally prohibits us from deducting any compensation over $1 million per taxable year paid to certain of our executive officers. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) among other changes, repealed the exception from the deduction limit under Section 162(m) for performance-based compensation effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that compensation paid to our covered executive officers in excess of $1 million will not be deductible, unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain ~~arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017 that are not materially modified after that date.~~grandfathered awards. In addition, the regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code contain a transition rule that applies to companies, such as ours, that become subject to Section 162(m) of the Code by reason of becoming publicly held prior to a certain date. Pursuant to this rule, certain compensation granted during a transition period (and, with respect to RSUs, that are paid out before the end of the transition period) is not counted toward the deduction limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code if the compensation is paid under a compensation arrangement that was in existence before the effective date of the initial public offering and certain other requirements are met. While certain of our equity awards may be eligible to be excluded from our deductibility limitation of Section 162(m) of the Code pursuant to this transition rule, neither our compensation committee nor its authorized committee has adopted a policy that all equity or other compensation must be deductible.

Further, while the compensation committee may consider the deductibility of equity awards and cash and other compensation as one factor in determining executive compensation, the Committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions and retains the flexibility to award compensation that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if the awards are not deductible by us for tax purposes.

In addition to considering the tax consequences, the compensation committee generally considers the accounting consequences of its decisions, including the impact of expenses being recognized in connection with equity-based awards, in determining the size and form of different equity-based awards.

Taxation of Parachute Payments and Deferred Compensation

We do not provide, and have no obligation to provide, any of our NEOs with a “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability he or she might owe because of the application of Sections 280G, 4999 or 409A of the Code. If any of the payments or benefits provided for under the Severance Plan or otherwise payable to a named executive officer would constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code and could be subject to the related excise tax, he or she would receive either full payment of such payments and benefits or such lesser amount that would cause no portion of the payments and benefits being subject to the excise tax, whichever results in the greater after-tax benefits to our named executive officer.

Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy

If the Company is required as a result of misconduct to restate our financial results due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer may be legally required by the SEC to reimburse us for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation they receive pursuant to the provisions of Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, the SEC is expected to approve listing standards that will require companies to implement clawback policies for the recovery of incentive-based compensation, and the Company will implement any such required clawback policy in accordance with SEC and Nasdaq requirements no later than by the date required by such rules.

~~-37-~~-41-

Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table For Fiscal ~~Years 2018, 2019~~Years 2020, 2021 and ~~2020~~2022

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our named executive officers during the years ended December 31, ~~2018, 2019~~2020, 2021 and ~~2020.~~2022.

Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($)
Bonus ($)(1)
Stock Awards ($)(2)
Option
Awards ($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total ($)
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D. 2020 589,472 648,419 2,596,305 5,456,849 11,400 9,302,445
President and Chief Executive Officer 2019 566,800 311,740 838,168 3,252,452 9,447 4,978,607
2018 545,000 524,563 — 4,914,360 — 5,983,923
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D. 2020 449,400 359,520 1,364,638 2,018,444 11,400 4,203,402
Chief Operating Officer and Secretary 2019 428,000 171,200 305,830 1,558,941 12,657 2,476,628
2018 400,000 355,000 179,673 2,948,616 18,500 3,901,789
Steve E. Krognes 2020 484,200 387,362 1,364,638 2,018,444 11,400 4,266,044
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 2019 470,057 188,023 305,830 1,558,941 7,834 2,530,685
2018 455,260 393,682 179,673 2,948,616 24,000 4,001,231
Carole Ho, M.D. 2020 457,600 366,080 1,382,774 2,107,493 11,400 4,325,347
Chief Medical Officer 2019 440,000 176,000 305,830 1,558,941 8,800 2,489,571
2018 423,124 371,187 179,673 2,948,616 12,869 3,935,469


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Bonus(1)		Stock Awards(2)		Option Awards(3)		All Other Compensation(4)		Total
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	2022	$	645,000	$	387,000	$	2,930,740	$	5,309,748	$	12,200	$	9,284,688
President and Chief Executive Officer	2021	$	610,104	$	503,335	$	4,251,600	$	7,296,840	$	11,600	$	12,673,479
	2020	$	589,472	$	648,419	$	2,596,305	$	5,456,849	$	11,400	$	9,302,445
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.(5)	2022	$	500,000	$	225,000	$	2,307,095	$	2,647,757	$	12,200	$	5,692,052
Chief Operating and Financial Officer and Secretary	2021	$	465,129	$	279,077	$	2,125,800	$	3,648,420	$	11,600	$	6,530,026
	2020	$	449,400	$	359,520	$	1,364,638	$	2,018,444	$	11,400	$	4,203,402
Steve E. Krognes(5)	2022	$	167,067	$	—	$	1,465,370	$	2,647,757	$	6,683	$	4,286,877
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (until May 1, 2022)	2021	$	501,150	$	300,690	$	2,125,800	$	3,648,420	$	11,600	$	6,587,660
	2020	$	484,200	$	387,362	$	1,364,638	$	2,018,444	$	11,400	$	4,266,044
Carole Ho, M.D.	2022	$	500,000	$	225,000	$	2,307,095	$	2,647,757	$	12,200	$	5,692,052
Chief Medical Officer	2021	$	473,616	$	284,170	$	2,125,800	$	3,648,420	$	11,600	$	6,543,606
	2020	$	457,600	$	366,080	$	1,382,774	$	2,107,493	$	11,400	$	4,325,347

(1)The amounts included in this column reflect bonus payments earned in ~~2018, 2019~~2020, 2021 and ~~2020.~~2022.

(2)The amounts included in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted during ~~2018, 2019~~2020, 2021 and ~~2020~~2022 based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

(3)The amounts included in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options granted during ~~2018, 2019~~2020, 2021 and ~~2020~~2022 computed in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. The assumptions that we used to calculate these amounts are discussed in Note 109 to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2022 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2022. These amounts do not reflect the actual economic value that will be realized by the ~~named executive officer~~NEO upon the vesting of the stock options, the exercise of the stock options, or the sale of the common stock underlying such stock options.

(4)The amounts included in this column reflect the dollar value of employer 401(k) matching contributions paid to each named executive officer.

(5)On May 1, 2022, Mr. Krognes transitioned from his role as Chief Financial Officer to join the Company’s board of directors, and Dr. Schuth added the Chief Financial Officer role to his former responsibilities, becoming Denali’s Chief Operating and Financial Officer. According to the terms of his transition, all stock and option awards granted to Mr. Krognes during the year ended December 31, 2022 were forfeited when he ceased to be an employee of the Company.

~~-38-~~-42-

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year ~~2020~~2022

The following table provides information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2022.


		Grant Date	All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock or units	All other option awards: Number of securities underlying options	Exercise or base price of stock and option awards	Grant Date fair value of stock and option awards
Name	Name		(#)(1)	(#)(2)	($/share)(#)(3)	($)(#)(4)	Name	Grant Date	All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock or units(1)	All other option awards: Number of securities underlying options(2)	Exercise or base price of stock and option awards($/share)(3)		Grant Date fair value of stock and option awards(4)
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	2/10/2020	—	367,675	24.81	5,456,849	Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	01/03/2022	—	186,500	$	47.27	$	5,309,748
		2/10/2020	78,787	—	—	1,954,705		01/03/2022	62,000	—	$	47.27	$	2,930,740
		8/18/2020	20,000	—	—	641,600
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	2/10/2020	—	136,000	24.81	2,018,444	Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	01/03/2022	—	93,000	$	47.27	$	2,647,757
		2/10/2020	29,143	—	—	723,038		01/03/2022	31,000	—	$	47.27	$	1,465,370
		8/18/2020	20,000	—	—	641,600		08/09/2022	22,500	—	$	37.41	$	841,725
Steve E. Krognes		2/10/2020	—	136,000	24.81	2,018,444
Steve E. Krognes(5)							Steve E. Krognes(5)	01/03/2022	—	93,000	$	47.27	$	2,647,757
		2/10/2020	29,143	—	—	723,038		01/03/2022	31,000	—	$	47.27	$	1,465,370
		8/18/2020	20,000	—	—	641,600
Carole Ho, M.D.	Carole Ho, M.D.	2/10/2020	—	142,000	24.81	2,107,493	Carole Ho, M.D.	01/03/2022	—	93,000	$	47.27	$	2,647,757
		2/10/2020	29,874	—	—	741,174		01/03/2022	31,000	—	$	47.27	$	1,465,370
		8/18/2020	20,000	—	—	641,600		08/09/2022	22,500	—	$	37.41	$	841,725


¨			Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨			Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a‑6(e)(2))
x			Definitive Proxy Statement
¨			Definitive Additional Materials
¨			Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a‑~~11(c) or §240.14a‑2~~12


			~~(1)~~						~~Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:~~


			~~(2)~~						~~Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:~~


			~~(3)~~						~~Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0‑11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):~~


			~~(4)~~						~~Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:~~


			~~(5)~~						~~Total fee paid:~~


¨			Fee paid previously with preliminary ~~materials.~~materials
¨			~~Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided~~Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act ~~Rule 0‑11(a)(2)~~Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and ~~identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.~~0-11


			~~(1)~~						~~Amount Previously Paid:~~


			~~(2)~~						~~Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:~~


			~~(3)~~						~~Filing Party:~~


			~~(4)~~						~~Date Filed:~~


Time and Date			June 1, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time

Place			The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders to be conducted via live webcast. You will be able to attend the virtual Annual Meeting by accessing www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/DNLI2023. You will need the 16-digit control number found on your Notice of Internet Availability, your proxy card or on the instructions that accompany your proxy materials to participate in the Annual Meeting and vote your shares electronically.

Items of Business			•To elect three directors from the nominees described in this proxy statement. •To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. •To approve, on an advisory basis, executive compensation. •To transact other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

Record Date			April 4, 2023 (the “Record Date”). Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.


x			No fee ~~required.~~required
¨			~~Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a‑6(i)(4) and 0‑11.~~


			Page
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING			1
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			9
PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			2025
PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM			2126
PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			2328
COMMITTEE REPORTS			2429
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS			2631
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			2832
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION			5055
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION			5459
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT			5560
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS			5863
OTHER MATTERS			6065
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS			6066
PROPOSALS OF STOCKHOLDERS FOR ~~2021~~202 4 ANNUAL MEETING			6167
ADMISSION TICKET AND VOTING INSTRUCTIONS			6268


	2020		2019
Audit Fees(1)	$	1,621,000	$	1,185,000
Audit-Related Fees(2)	10,000		—
Tax Fees(3)	—		10,000

Total Fees	$	1,631,000	$	1,195,000


Executive	2020 Base Salary		Annual Target Bonus (% of base)		Goal Achievement		2020 Earned Award
Ryan J. Watts, Ph. D.	$	589,472	55	%	200	%	$	648,419
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	$	449,400	40	%	200	%	$	359,520
Steve E. Krognes	$	484,200	40	%	200	%	$	387,360
Carole Ho, M.D.	$	457,600	40	%	200	%	$	366,080


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)(1)	Stock Awards ($)(2)	Option Awards ($)(3)	All Other Compensation ($)(4)	Total ($)
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	2020	589,472	648,419	2,596,305	5,456,849	11,400	9,302,445
President and Chief Executive Officer	2019	566,800	311,740	838,168	3,252,452	9,447	4,978,607
	2018	545,000	524,563	—	4,914,360	—	5,983,923
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	2020	449,400	359,520	1,364,638	2,018,444	11,400	4,203,402
Chief Operating Officer and Secretary	2019	428,000	171,200	305,830	1,558,941	12,657	2,476,628
	2018	400,000	355,000	179,673	2,948,616	18,500	3,901,789
Steve E. Krognes	2020	484,200	387,362	1,364,638	2,018,444	11,400	4,266,044
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	2019	470,057	188,023	305,830	1,558,941	7,834	2,530,685
	2018	455,260	393,682	179,673	2,948,616	24,000	4,001,231
Carole Ho, M.D.	2020	457,600	366,080	1,382,774	2,107,493	11,400	4,325,347
Chief Medical Officer	2019	440,000	176,000	305,830	1,558,941	8,800	2,489,571
	2018	423,124	371,187	179,673	2,948,616	12,869	3,935,469


		Option Awards		Stock Awards			Option Awards			Stock Awards
Name	Name	Number of shares acquired on exercise (#)	Value realized on exercise ($)(1)	Number of shares acquired on vesting (#)	Value realized on vesting ($)(2)	Name	Number of shares acquired on exercise	Value realized on exercise(1)		Number of shares acquired on vesting	Value realized on vesting(2)
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	—	—	14,315	270,840	Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	70,749	$	2,166,082	48,497	$	1,889,840
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	—	—	9,893	266,121	Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	20,000	$	601,400	24,036	$	932,073
Steve E. Krognes		—	—	9,893	266,121
Steve E. Krognes(3)						Steve E. Krognes(3)	62,500	$	2,223,750	24,036	$	932,073
Carole Ho, M.D.	Carole Ho, M.D.	52,906	1,876,136	9,893	266,121	Carole Ho, M.D.	—	$	—	24,219	$	938,711


Name	Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control	Change in Control ($)	Change in Control with Qualifying Termination ($)	Termination Without Cause ($)
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	Base Salary	—	1,178,944	589,472
	Target Bonus	—	648,419	324,210
	Welfare(1)	—	88,228	44,114
	Restricted Stock Units(2)	—	10,947,683	—
	Stock Options(3)	—	38,461,423	—
	Performance and Market-Based Options(4)	103,485,860	103,485,860	—

	TOTAL	103,485,860	154,810,557	957,796
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	Base Salary	—	449,400	337,050
	Target Bonus	—	179,760	179,760
	Welfare(1)	—	32,631	24,473
	Restricted Stock Units(2)	—	5,184,158	—
	Stock Options(3)	—	17,482,309	—
	Performance and Market-Based Options(4)	20,697,139	20,697,139	—

	TOTAL	20,697,139	44,025,397	541,283
Steve E. Krognes	Base Salary	—	484,203	363,152
	Target Bonus	—	193,681	193,681
	Welfare(1)	—	—	—
	Restricted Stock Units(2)	—	5,184,158	—
	Stock Options(3)	—	17,482,313	—
	Performance and Market-Based Options(4)	10,385,000	10,385,000	—

	TOTAL	10,385,000	33,729,355	556,833
Carole Ho, M.D.	Base Salary	—	457,600	343,200
	Target Bonus	—	183,040	183,040
	Welfare(1)	—	41,821	31,366
	Restricted Stock Units(2)	—	5,245,386	—
	Stock Options(3)	—	17,370,032	—
	Performance and Market-Based Options(4)	10,385,000	10,385,000	—

	TOTAL	10,385,000	33,682,879	557,606


Name	Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control	Change in Control		Change in Control with Qualifying Termination		Termination Without Cause
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.	Base Salary	$	—	$	1,290,000	$	645,000
	Target Bonus	—		774,000		387,000
	Welfare(1)	—		88,976		44,488
	Restricted Stock Units(2)	—		4,594,045		—
	Stock Options(3)	—		435,340		—


	TOTAL	$	—	$	7,182,361	$	1,076,488
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.	Base Salary	$	—	$	500,000	$	375,000
	Target Bonus	—		225,000		225,000
	Welfare(1)	—		32,931		24,698
	Restricted Stock Units(2)	—		2,915,100		—
	Stock Options(3)	—		174,674		—


	TOTAL	$	—	$	3,847,705	$	624,698
Carole Ho, M.D.	Base Salary	$	—	$	500,000	$	375,000
	Target Bonus	—		225,000		225,000
	Welfare(1)	—		43,615		32,711
	Restricted Stock Units(2)	—		2,925,250		—
	Stock Options(3)	—		179,924		—


	TOTAL	$	—	$	3,873,789	$	632,711


Fiscal Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(1)	Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(2)	Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(3)	Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(4)	Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on:		Net Income (loss) (in thousands)(7)	Company- Selected Measure(8)
					Total Share- holder Return(5)	Peer Group Total Share- holder Return(6)
2022	$9,284,688	$(12,121,657)	$5,223,660	$(2,101,277)	159.64	113.65	$(325,991)	N/A
2021	$12,673,479	$(58,240,593)	$6,553,764	$(11,781,409)	256.03	126.45	$(290,581)	N/A
2020	$9,302,445	$140,704,504	$4,264,931	$36,695,336	480.83	126.42	$71,136	N/A


Fiscal Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO	Less: Reported Value of Equity Awards to PEO(a)	Add: Equity Award Adjustments to PEO(b)	Compensation Actually Paid to PEO

2022	$9,284,688	$(8,240,488)	$(13,165,857)	$(12,121,657)
2021	$12,673,479	$(11,548,440)	$(59,365,632)	$(58,240,593)
2020	$9,302,445	$(8,053,154)	$139,455,213	$140,704,504


Fiscal Year	Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year	Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years	Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year	Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year	Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year	Total Equity Award Adjustments

2022	$4,292,254	$(15,184,024)	$—	$(2,274,087)	$—	$(13,165,857)
2021	$6,142,063	$(46,889,675)	$—	$(18,618,020)	$—	$(59,365,632)
2020	$32,742,847	$103,131,232	$—	$3,581,134	$—	$139,455,213


	Year Ended December 31,
	2022	2021	2020
Expected term (in years)	3.65 - 5.47	3.65 - 5.47	3.77 - 5.53
Volatility	63.50% - 67.73%	57.46% - 63.34%	63.35% - 78.04%
Risk-free interest rate	1.49% - 4.45%	0.30% - 1.45%	0.19% - 1.65%
Dividend yield	—	—	—


Fiscal Year	Average Summary Compensation Table Total for non-PEO NEOs	Less: Average Reported Value of Equity Awards to non-PEO NEOs(a)	Add: Average Equity Award Adjustments to non-PEO NEOs(b)	Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs

2022	$5,223,660	$(4,674,277)	$(2,650,660)	$(2,101,277)
2021	$6,553,764	$(5,774,220)	$(12,560,953)	$(11,781,409)
2020	$4,264,931	$(3,418,810)	$35,849,215	$36,695,336


Fiscal Year	Average Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year	Average Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years	Average Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year	Average Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year	Average Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year	Total Average Equity Award Adjustments

2022	$1,868,705	$(2,967,213)	$—	$(960,069)	$(592,083)	$(2,650,660)
2021	$3,071,031	$(10,579,485)	$—	$(5,052,499)	$—	$(12,560,953)
2020	$13,320,406	$20,605,545	$—	$1,923,264	$—	$35,849,215


	2020 Annual Retainer ($)		2021 Annual Retainer ($)
Board of Directors:
All non-employee members	$	40,000	$	40,000
Additional retainer for Non-Executive Chairperson of the Board	30,000		35,000
Audit Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	18,000		20,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	9,000		10,000
Compensation Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	12,000		15,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	6,000		7,500
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	8,000		10,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	4,000		5,000
Science and Technology Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	15,000		15,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	7,500		7,500


	2022 Annual Retainer		2023 Annual Retainer
Board of Directors:
All non-employee members	$	45,000	$	45,000
Additional retainer for Non-Executive Chairperson of the Board	$	35,000	$	35,000
Audit Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	$	20,000	$	20,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	$	10,000	$	10,000
Compensation Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	$	15,000	$	15,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	$	7,500	$	7,500
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	$	10,000	$	10,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	$	5,000	$	5,000
Science and Technology Committee:
Additional retainer for Chairperson	$	15,000	$	15,000
Additional retainer for Non-Chairperson members	$	7,500	$	7,500


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)(2)	Option Awards ($)(3)(4)	Total ($)
Vicki Sato, Ph.D.	78,000	93,751	250,586	422,337
Douglas Cole, M.D.	56,500	93,751	250,586	400,837
Jennifer Cook	44,000	93,751	250,586	388,337
Jay Flatley	55,000	93,751	250,586	399,337
Peter Klein	58,000	93,751	250,586	402,337
Robert Nelsen	46,000	93,751	250,586	390,337
David Schenkein, M.D.	59,000	93,751	250,586	403,337
Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.	59,500	93,751	250,586	403,837
Nancy A. Thornberry(5)	—	—	—	—


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards(1)		Option Awards(2)		Total
Vicki Sato, Ph.D.	$	85,000	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	488,101
Douglas Cole, M.D.	$	58,784	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	461,885
Jennifer Cook	$	55,000	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	458,101
Jay Flatley	$	70,000	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	473,101
Erik Harris	$	49,839	$	231,760	$	421,712	$	703,311
Peter Klein	$	65,000	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	468,101
Steve E. Krognes(3)	$	30,021	$	—	$	—	$	30,021
Robert Nelsen(4)	$	19,017	$	—	$	—	$	19,017
David Schenkein, M.D.	$	65,000	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	468,101
Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.	$	58,231	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	461,332
Nancy A. Thornberry	$	60,000	$	145,280	$	257,821	$	463,101


Plan Category	Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Restricted Stock Units and Rights	Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Rights		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in the first Column)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
2015 Stock Incentive Plan(1)	3,795,680	$	2.97	—
2017 Equity Incentive Plan(2)	11,465,925	$	17.45	3,708,330
2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(3)	—	—		970,681
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	—	—		—
TOTAL	15,261,605	$	17.93	4,679,011


Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned	Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned
5% Stockholders:
Biogen(1)	13,310,243	11.0	%
Baillie Gifford & Co(2)	12,190,256	10.1	%
ARCH Venture Fund VIII, L.P.(3)	10,668,749	8.8	%
Entities associated with AKDL, L.P.(4)	10,084,938	8.3	%
Vanguard Group(5)	7,925,057	6.5	%
T Rowe Price(6)	6,464,826	5.3	%
Blackrock(7)	6,376,078	5.3	%
FMR LLC(8)	6,167,937	5.1	%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Ryan J. Watts, Ph.D.(9)	3,629,186	3.0	%
Alexander O. Schuth, M.D.(10)	1,093,745	0.9	%
Steve E. Krognes(11)	1,378,567	1.1	%
Carole Ho, M.D.(12)	600,691	*
Vicki Sato, Ph.D.(13)	267,029	*
Douglas Cole, M.D.(14)	95,361	*
Jennifer Cook(15)	58,522	*
Jay Flatley(16)	420,361	*
Peter Klein(17)	57,291	*
Robert Nelsen(18)	10,766,140	8.9	%
David Schenkein, M.D.(19)	152,825	*
Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Ph.D.(20)	2,734,404	2.3	%
Nancy A. Thornberry(21)	—	*
All current executive officers and directors as a group (13 persons)(22)	21,254,122	17.0	%


						THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

						South San Francisco, California
						April ~~22, 2021~~18, 2023